Self-reported autism symptoms in adults with autism spectrum disorders.
The AQ checklist misses most adults with ASD, so add clinician and caregiver data before you rule autism in or out.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Goodwin et al. (2012) asked adults with autism to fill out the Autism-Spectrum Quotient, a 50-item checklist.
Clinicians and caregivers also rated the same adults.
The team then compared the three sets of scores to see if the checklist agreed with expert judgment.
What they found
Most adults who already had an autism diagnosis scored below the AQ cut-off.
The checklist matched poorly with what clinicians and caregivers saw.
In short, the AQ missed most adults who truly had ASD.
How this fits with other research
Baron-Cohen et al. (2004) had earlier shown that another self-report tool, the Empathy Quotient, cleanly separated adults with ASD from typical adults.
That success makes the AQ’s failure surprising, but the two tools measure different traits—empathy versus autistic traits—so both can be true.
Huang et al. (2020) later mapped the messy adult-diagnosis landscape and listed the AQ among tools that need better cut-offs, backing the 2012 warning.
Gotham et al. (2015) surveyed thousands of adults with ASD and found huge unmet needs; using a weak screen like the AQ would leave even more adults unsupported.
Why it matters
If you screen adults for autism, do not stop at the AQ. Add a clinician interview, caregiver report, or direct observation. One missed adult means lost years of job coaching, mental-health care, and social support. Build a fuller battery today and spare your clients the run-around.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pair any AQ you give to an adult with a brief structured interview like the ADOS-2 module 4 or a caregiver scale.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Scores on the autism spectrum quotient (AQ) were examined in 65 adults with ASD. Maternal reports of symptoms were collected simultaneously using the autism diagnostic interview-revised (ADI-R) and the Vineland Screener. A slightly revised AQ administration procedure was used to accommodate adults with below average IQ. AQ scores were lower than in the original validation study, with only 11 adults (17%) scoring above the proposed diagnostic cut-off and 24 (27%) exceeding the screening cut-off. Adults with higher IQs endorsed more symptoms than those with below average intelligence, but even when analyses were restricted to the 39 adults with at least average IQ, only 44% met the screening cut-off. AQ scores were not significantly correlated with ADI-R or Vineland scores.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2012 · doi:10.1186/2040-2392-1-10