Self-injurious behavior in Rett syndrome: interactions between features of Rett syndrome and operant conditioning.
In Rett syndrome, each form of self-injury can have its own operant job—test them separately.
01Research in Context
What this study did
One girl with Rett syndrome kept hitting her own face and biting her hand.
The team ran a short functional analysis. They gave her toys, then took them away. They gave demands, then let her rest. They even left her alone for a few minutes.
Each test lasted only five minutes. They watched which condition made each form of self-injury spike.
What they found
Face hitting happened most when the room was empty. It looked like automatic reinforcement—she did it for her own sensory feedback.
Hand biting happened most when adults gave demands. It looked like escape—she did it to get out of work.
Two topographies, two jobs. One behavior was not just "more severe." It was a different tool.
How this fits with other research
Allison et al. (1980) showed the same escape pattern in two boys with ID 13 years earlier. Their work gave the template: if problem behavior drops when you remove demands, treat it as escape.
Raslear et al. (1992) later found that up to 41 % of girls with Rett use challenging behavior to communicate. The new case says you still test each form, even if it might be "talking."
Chen et al. (2017) warn that sleep loss and ADHD signs can also drive aggression in ASD. The Rett case adds: once medical variables are ruled out, run a mini-analysis for every separate movement.
Why it matters
If you treat all self-injury in Rett as one thing, you might pick the wrong intervention. Automatic behavior needs enrichment or response blocking. Escape behavior needs demand fading and a break request. Next time you see mixed topographies, run a five-minute test for each form. Match the cure to the cause, not the diagnosis.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick the two most common SIB topographies and run a 5-minute alone vs demand test for each.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Operant and biological theories of the cause of self-injurious behavior (SIB) in people with a mental handicap are often viewed as mutually exclusive. In this single case study, interactions between features of Rett syndrome and operant conditioning as determinants of SIB are examined. Functional analysis by analog methodology indicated different functions for two forms of SIB shown by the subject: automatic reinforcement by sensory stimulation and escape from social interactions. It is suggested that features of Rett syndrome established conditions under which operant conditioning of self-injurious responding was maximized. The implications of this interaction between features of syndromes and operant conditioning for the conceptualization of the cause of SIB are discussed and it is proposed that the notion of a unitary cause of SIB is inappropriate. It is more productive to consider operant conditioning as the process that maintains responding against a background of predisposing and mediating factors which may be biologically determined.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1993 · doi:10.1007/BF01066421