Rumination and vomiting in the developmentally disabled: a critical review of the behavioral, medical, and psychiatric treatment research.
When doctors rule out stomach disease, behavioral tricks like DRI and snack timing beat pills for stopping rumination.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Barrett et al. (1987) read every paper they could find on rumination and vomiting in people with developmental disabilities. They looked at three kinds of treatments: medical, psychiatric, and behavioral. The team wanted to know which approach had the best proof when doctors ruled out stomach or gut problems.
They pulled studies from hospitals, clinics, and research journals. The review covered kids and adults living in both institutions and family homes.
What they found
When no physical illness was found, behavioral methods won by a mile. DRI (doing something else with the mouth) and filling the stomach with small, frequent meals cut rumination fastest. Medical drugs helped only when real gut disease was present. Psychiatric talk or drugs showed almost no effect.
The authors warned that medicine often gets tried first, yet behavior plans give the quickest relief for the largest group.
How this fits with other research
Loukus (2015) updated the same question 28 years later and agreed: start with a functional analysis. That review adds newer tricks like continuous access to a preferred sippy cup or extra feedings right before problem times. The core message stayed the same—behavior first, medicine only for clear biology.
Lancioni et al. (2009) looked at hand stereotypies instead of rumination but found the same pattern. Simple behavioral tactics worked, yet no single fix fits every client. Both reviews remind you to test, then pick the least intrusive option that works.
Demello et al. (1992) showed one DRA plan can knock down several problem behaviors at once. Their single-case success lines up with P et al.’s claim that behavioral packages can be both powerful and efficient.
Why it matters
Before you order labs or meds for a client who brings up food, run a quick functional analysis. Try DRI with a chewy tube or schedule extra snacks first. Track for three days—if rumination drops, you just saved weeks of pointless medication trials. If it doesn’t budge, then pursue medical work-up with clear data in hand.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Give your ruminating client a sugar-free chewy tube and collect 30-second data for one day—see if the behavior dips before calling the doctor.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Medical and psychiatric research regarding the treatment of vomiting and rumination among developmentally disabled individuals was selectively reviewed. Because of serious methodological flaws which pervade the psychiatric literature, claims for the effectiveness of psychiatric interventions for vomiting and rumination cannot be justified. Medical interventions (e.g., pharmacological and surgical interventions) were found to be effective when rumination was attributable to a specific organic pathology. In the absence of identified organic pathology for rumination, medical interventions are of questionable efficacy and because of the risks and side effects associated with these procedures, are seldom the intervention of first choice for functional rumination. Behavioral procedures for the treatment of vomiting and rumination are described and critically reviewed for their efficacy, side effects, and the generalization and maintenance of their effects. Although methodological weaknesses limit conclusions regarding the efficacy of some behavioral interventions, several procedures have sound experimental support including oral hygiene, differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors, and food satiation procedures. These behavioral interventions are the treatments of choice when organic causes of rumination cannot be identified. Suggestions for future research and applications are discussed.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1987 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(87)90055-2