Assessment & Research

Risk recognition and sensation seeking in revictimization and posttraumatic stress disorder.

Volkert et al. (2013) · Behavior modification 2013
★ The Verdict

Excitement can slow danger recognition in repeat trauma survivors, so teach clients to notice body cues and exit fast.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing safety plans for adults with complex trauma.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving clients whose main risk is property destruction, not social threat.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Jana and team built a new audio task that acts out risky dating scenes.

Adults who had been assaulted more than once listened and hit a button when they felt danger.

The researchers also gave surveys on PTSD and sensation seeking.

02

What they found

People with repeat victimization did NOT score lower on overall danger spotting.

Yet when the team factored in how excited the listener felt, the same group took longer to label the scene as unsafe.

Higher PTSD symptoms made people leave the scene sooner, but only in the audio test.

03

How this fits with other research

Reis et al. (2022) taught girls with ID to name sexual risks. The girls learned the facts yet still walked into mock danger, matching Jana’s finding that knowing risk and acting on it are two separate skills.

Wehman et al. (2014) showed that what revs you up or calms you down (motivational operations) drives escape behavior. Jana adds arousal as a key MO that can delay or speed exit from threat.

Jones et al. (2010) built scales showing trauma survivors take sexual risks to avoid bad feelings. Jana’s twist: high sensation seeking blunts the gut cue that says “get out,” offering a new leverage point for intervention.

04

Why it matters

If a client has repeat trauma history, don’t assume they can’t read danger. Check how excitement or numbness warps their timing. Build drills that pair rising internal cues with quick exit plans, and test them in lifelike role-plays, not just paper quizzes.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a 2-minute audio role-play, pause every 10 seconds, and have the client rate body excitement and safety—practice leaving when either hits 4/5.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

Impaired risk recognition has been suggested to be associated with the risk for revictimization and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Moreover, risk behavior has been linked to high sensation seeking, which may also increase the probability of revictimization. A newly designed behavioral experiment with five audiotaped risk scenarios was used to investigate risk recognition in revictimized, single-victimized, and nontraumatized individuals with and without PTSD. Moreover, the potential role of sensation seeking in revictimization, and PTSD as well as its relation to risk recognition was explored. Revictimized, single-victimized, and nontraumatized individuals did not differ with regard to general risk recognition. However, delayed risk recognition was found for the revictimized group when arousal ratings were considered. No differences in sensation seeking were found between the three groups; only the nontraumatized group showed lower boredom susceptibility relative to the revictimized group. Delayed risk recognition was associated with high sensation seeking. Furthermore, PTSD symptoms significantly predicted exit levels of risk scenarios. Findings are discussed against the background of previous research.

Behavior modification, 2013 · doi:10.1177/0145445512449647