Responsiveness to Self-Report Interview Questions by Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disability.
Only self-advocates with mild ID and fluent speech give reliable survey answers; everyone else needs adjusted methods.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers asked 11,391 adults with intellectual or developmental disability to answer interview questions about their lives. They wanted to know how many could give clear, scorable answers on their own. The team recorded whether each person spoke fluently or needed help, and how severe their disability appeared.
What they found
About six in ten adults gave answers that could be scored. People who spoke easily and had milder disabilities were far more likely to respond well. Many others gave all-or-nothing replies—either one-word answers or none at all.
How this fits with other research
Graves et al. (2016) later showed the same pattern in adults with Down syndrome; self-ratings on a health survey matched caregiver reports, but only when the adults could speak fluently. Son et al. (2013) found a warning sign: women with ID often said they had cancer screenings they never actually had, so self-report alone can mislead. Bakhtiari et al. (2021) added that youth with autism can self-report if their IQ is above 80 and they can pay attention—again linking success to ability level, not diagnosis.
Why it matters
Before you hand a client a questionnaire, watch how they talk. Fluent speech and mild ID predict usable answers. If the client gives short or random replies, switch to caregiver interview or simple yes-no checks. This quick screen saves time and keeps your data clean.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start each intake by asking an open question like 'How has your week been?' If the reply is under five clear words, use caregiver proxy for the rest of the survey.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
An important line of research involves asking people with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) to self-report their experiences and opinions. We analyzed the responsiveness of 11,391 adult users of IDD services to interview questions from Section 1 of the 2008-2009 National Core Indicators-Adult Consumer Survey (NCI-ACS). Proxy responses were not allowed for the selected questions. Overall, 62.1% of participants answered the questions and were rated by interviewers as understanding the questions and as responding consistently. Most participants responded in an all-or-none fashion, answering either all or most questions or few to none. Individuals with milder levels of IDD and with speech as their primary means of expression were more likely to answer the questions and provide a scoreable response. Interviewer ratings of interviewees' answering questions, understanding of questions, and consistent responding were each related to responsiveness.
Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2015 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-53.3.163