Assessment & Research

Remote assessment of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

White et al. (2024) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2024
★ The Verdict

Remote Penn CNB testing gives you clean neurocognitive data for clients with 22q11.2DS without leaving home.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess teens or adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and want to cut travel demands.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who already use fully remote tools or work with clients who lack stable internet.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team gave the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery to 47 teens and adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Half took the test at home on their own computer. Half took it in a clinic with a proctor watching.

The researchers then compared accuracy and speed between the two groups.

02

What they found

Accuracy scores were almost identical in both settings.

Remote testers finished a few minutes slower, but the gap was tiny.

No one needed extra help to log in or finish the tasks.

03

How this fits with other research

Sáez-Suanes et al. (2023) showed that 22q11.2 carriers score lower on speed and accuracy no matter where they test. The new study says the drop is the same remote or in-person, so the setting is not the problem.

Storch et al. (2012) found that slow scores come from psychomotor speed, not poor vision or motor skill. Cummings et al. (2024) now prove you can measure that speed just as well on a home laptop.

Liang et al. (2026) pooled data from many studies and saw that youth with NDDs, including 22q11.2DS, move less each day. Remote cognitive testing could free up clinic time for movement programs instead of long assessment visits.

04

Why it matters

You can send the Penn CNB by email and still trust the scores. That means fewer long car rides for families, shorter wait lists, and quicker access to baseline data for your behavior plans. Try it next time you need updated cognitive levels before writing an FBA or adjusting skill sequences.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Email the Penn CNB link, schedule a 5-minute tech check, and score the results the same way you do for in-person tests.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
384
Population
other
Finding
positive
Magnitude
small

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive functioning is an integral phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome relating to severity of psychopathology and outcomes. A neurocognitive battery that could be administered remotely to assess multiple cognitive domains would be especially beneficial to research on rare genetic variants, where in-person assessment can be unavailable or burdensome. The current study compares in-person and remote assessments of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery (CNB). METHODS: Participants (mean age = 17.82, SD = 6.94 years; 48% female) completed the CNB either in-person at a laboratory (n = 222) or remotely (n = 162). RESULTS: Results show that accuracy of CNB performance was equivalent across the two testing locations, while slight differences in speed were detected in 3 of the 11 tasks. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the CNB can be used in remote settings to assess multiple neurocognitive domains.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2024 · doi:10.1111/jir.13115