Quality of life indicators for individuals with intellectual disabilities: extending current practice.
Swap fixed quality-of-life checklists for capability questions that spotlight each person’s desired freedoms.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Ivan and colleagues looked at how we measure quality of life for people with intellectual disability. They read many papers and wrote a narrative review. Their goal was to show why one-size-fits-all checklists miss what really matters to each person.
The team argued for the Capabilities Framework. This view asks what a person is free to do and to be, not just what they have done.
What they found
The paper found that current tools often list fixed domains like housing or health. These lists can hide changes that are vital to the individual. The authors say we should track personal goals and real-day choices instead.
How this fits with other research
Tonnsen et al. (2016) built on this idea. They gave a three-step recipe to craft a theory of individual quality of life. The steps turn the Capabilities call into a clear practice guide.
Adams et al. (2021) went further. Their six-step research protocol shows how to test any supports-based quality-of-life model. Together, the three papers form a chain: ask what matters, build a plan, then test it.
Cameranesi et al. (2022) supplied proof. They moved adults with profound ID from large wards to small community homes and saw big gains in every quality-of-life domain. The move gave people more daily choices, just as the Capabilities view predicts.
Why it matters
If you write plans, set goals, or review policies, shift from fixed checklists to personal capability questions. Ask, "What options does this person want more of?" Then track those options, not just standard domains. The Capabilities path keeps the focus on freedom and choice, and later work shows it can be done and measured.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one capability probe to your next assessment: "What daily choice does the client want more control over?"
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Quality of life is a social construct that is measured by what are considered to be its most appropriate indicators. Quality of life measurement in intellectual disability reflects a variety of indicators, often grouped under life domains. Subjective and objective methods of measuring indicators each have strengths and drawbacks, but it is currently considered best to use both methods. Indicators of quality of life that are common to all people have been measured to date, although indicators that are unique to individuals are highly useful for enhancing individual development and for applying person-centered practice. Aggregate quality of life data from individuals may not always be the best source of information for evaluating policies and service practices. A case is made for supplementing quality of life frameworks or adopting other frameworks for these purposes, with the Capabilities Framework offered as an example. Further, an argument is made that a pragmatic approach might best be taken to policy and program evaluation, whereby the key criterion for using a conceptual framework and set of indicators is its usefulness in effecting positive change in people's lives.
Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.316