Assessment & Research

Psychiatric literacy and the conduct disorders.

Furnham et al. (2012) · Research in developmental disabilities 2012
★ The Verdict

Most young adults can't spot conduct disorder, so brief parent education at intake can boost early referral.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with school-age kids in clinics or schools
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve adults with mood disorders

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team showed short stories to 327 college students. Each story described a teen with conduct problems.

Students picked a label for the problem. Labels ranged from "bad kid" to "conduct disorder."

02

What they found

Only a large share to a large share chose the right label. Most missed the diagnosis.

When the teen also broke the law, more students guessed "conduct disorder."

03

How this fits with other research

Pitchford et al. (2019) ran a similar survey with preschool ASD. Parents spotted signs better than teachers. Both studies show lay people miss disorders.

Matson et al. (2004) gave clinicians the PAS-ADD checklist for adults with ID. They found a large share screened positive. Unlike Adrian's study, clinicians had a tool, so recognition rose.

Winburn et al. (2014) showed kids with PDA act like both ASD and conduct disorder. Adrian's low recognition rates may partly stem from this overlap.

04

Why it matters

If college students can't name conduct problems, parents likely can't either. When families blame "bad behavior," kids wait longer for help. You can close the gap. Add a brief explainer to your intake forms. List key signs: daily fights, cruelty to animals, stolen items. One extra minute of reading can steer parents toward assessment instead of punishment.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a one-page "Is it more than misbehavior?" sheet to your parent packet.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
survey
Sample size
125
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Past research regarding mental health literacy has indicated that public knowledge is lamentably poor. This study aimed to examine the effect of demographics, experience and personality, as predictors for understanding conduct disorders. An opportunistic sample of 125 participants with a mean age of 24.29 years completed an online questionnaire in which they were asked to describe and evaluate vignettes of 4 conduct disorders. They were asked for their view of what the diagnosis may be: "What is the main problem", confidence in their diagnosis, and how the person could be helped. The correct diagnosis was given by 42% of the participants in one case but only 8% in another. A content analysis suggested that five types of diagnosis were given: psychological/psychiatric, behavioural, parenting, socio-emotional and lifestyle. There were significant differences in what treatments were thought to be useful between the cases though psychotherapy was thought to be most useful. Limitations of this study are considered.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2012 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.001