Problem behavior and psychiatric impairment within a developmentally disabled population. III: Psychotropic medication.
Psych med use rises with age, behavior severity, and setting restrictiveness in DD services, so flag these drivers in your next medication review.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Malott (1988) looked at every person in one state’s developmental-disability system. That was 35,000 adults and youths.
The team asked: who takes psych meds, how many, and where do they live? They used surveys and file reviews.
What they found
Med use climbs with age. It also climbs with behavior severity and with how locked the home is.
People who also have a psychiatric label get the most pills. The survey gave the first big map of this pattern.
How this fits with other research
Marcell et al. (1988) looked at the same decade and saw the opposite problem. Only 3% of research papers even said if subjects were on meds. Malott (1988) filled that gap by actually counting the pills.
Yamashiro et al. (2019) and Ellingsen et al. (2014) later repeated the count. They found the same climb in adults with ASD and in kids on Medicaid. The trend has not gone away; it has grown.
Soto et al. (2024) took the next step. They showed that adding an emotional-development assessment in hospital cut antipsychotic load. The old map of high use is now a road map for reduction.
Why it matters
You now know that age, setting restrictiveness, and dual diagnosis are red flags for over-medication. Use this list when you review cases. Pair each med with a behavior plan and ask the team: is this pill still needed? You can start the taper talk with data from 1988 that still holds true today.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Open the med chart for your most restrictive-house client and list each psych drug next to its target behavior—then schedule a team review.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This report is the third in a series on problem behavior and psychiatric impairment in a population of 35,000 individuals receiving developmental disabilities services. Young and middle-aged adults were found to receive psychotropic medication at higher rates than children, adolescents, or elderly persons. Psychotropic receipt rates were found to increase with increasing severity of mental retardation, but most evidently with increasing restrictiveness of residential setting, increasing rated severity of problem behaviors, and presence of a psychiatric impairment. Rates of medication receipt also varied as a function of psychiatric diagnostic category. Discussion remarks emphasize the need to include information relative to clinical and social aspects of program settings and the roles and decision-making performance of physicians and psychologists in research on settings serving persons with developmental disabilities.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1988 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(88)90017-0