Assessment & Research

Physical fitness assessment in multiple sclerosis patients: a controlled study.

Guerra et al. (2014) · Research in developmental disabilities 2014
★ The Verdict

Even mildly affected MS adults fail basic fitness tests while reporting normal effort, so objective measures must guide rehab plans.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing fitness or daily-living programs for adults with multiple sclerosis in day-hab or outpatient settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who work only with children or non-neurological populations.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Van Hanegem et al. (2014) ran a quasi-experiment with adults who have mild multiple sclerosis. They gave everyone the same fitness tests: balance, strength, and a six-minute walk.

Each MS adult was matched to a healthy peer of the same age and sex. Both groups were sedentary, so any gap would come from the disease, not couch time.

02

What they found

The mild MS group scored lower on every hard measure. Balance sway was bigger, knee strength was weaker, and walking distance was shorter.

Odd twist: after the walk both groups said the effort felt the same. Objective tests caught problems the clients could not feel.

03

How this fits with other research

Congiu et al. (2010) looked at the same mild MS crowd but added fatigue, handwriting, and daily-living checks. Their mix correctly flagged 88 % of patients, showing one test is not enough.

Enkelaar et al. (2013) gave balance and gait tests to older adults with intellectual disability. Like E et al., they saw large deficits versus controls, proving cheap clinical tools are sensitive.

de Kuijper et al. (2014) tested kids with developmental language disorder. Fitness scores were lower even though activity logs matched typical peers, echoing the "feel fine, test poor" pattern seen here.

04

Why it matters

If you serve adults with MS, do not trust "I feel okay" alone. Add a quick balance scale, grip meter, or six-minute walk to your intake. These low-tech tools spot decline early and give you hard numbers to track before and after any rehab plan you run.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one balance test and one strength test to your intake packet for every adult MS client.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
27
Population
other
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

There is growing evidence to show the effectiveness of physical exercise for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate aerobic capacity, strength, balance, and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) after exercise, in ambulatory patients with mild MS and matched control healthy participants. Seventeen MS patients aged 48.09 ± 10.0 years, with mild MS disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale: EDSS 1.5 to 4.5) and 10 healthy sedentary age matched (41.9 ± 11.2 years) subjects volunteered for the study. MS patients underwent medical examination with resting electrocardiogram, arterial blood pressure, EDSS, and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-MFIS. Both groups also underwent physical assessment with the Berg Balance Scale(,) test (Berg), Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT), maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) of forearm, lower limb, shoulder strength test, and the Borg 10-point scale test. The one-way ANOVA showed significant differences for MFIS (F1.19=9.420; p<0.01), Berg (F1.19=13.125; p<0.01), handgrip MIVC (F1.19=4.567; p<0.05), lower limbs MIVC (F1.19=7.429; p<0.01), and 6MWT (F1.19=28.061; p<0.01) between groups. EDSS, Berg test and Borg scores explained 80% of 6MWT variation. Mild grade EDSS patients exhibited impaired balance, muscle strength, and low self pace-6MWT scores, whereas RPE response after the exercise was similar to that of sedentary individuals. Both groups showed similar global physiological adjustments to exercise.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.013