Perspectives on pain and intellectual disability.
People with intellectual disability feel pain—update your pain-assessment protocols to include behavioral indicators and individual baselines.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Ahlborn et al. (2008) wrote a narrative review. They pulled together studies on pain in people with intellectual disability.
The authors argue that these individuals do feel pain. They say new assessment tools are on the way.
What they found
The paper finds that pain is real and often missed. Behavioral cues like face grimaces or body tension can signal pain.
The review urges clinicians to watch each person's unique pain signs.
How this fits with other research
Plant et al. (2007) gave hard numbers. Kids with ID showed fewer daily living skills on pain days than on pain-free days. The review echoes this warning.
Luckasson et al. (2022) went further. They proved that pain faces differ by diagnosis. Kids with CP or DS show stronger and more varied expressions than kids with unknown IDD. The review's call for better tools now has lab support.
Amore et al. (2011) and Austin et al. (2015) link pain to sleep loss. Pain disrupts night sleep in youth with IDD and ASD even when meds are given. The review's message grows: untreated pain hurts function around the clock.
Why it matters
You may label a behavior as escape or attention when pain is the real cause. Start each session with a quick pain scan. Look for new grimaces, guarded movement, or change in baseline. Track these signs along with your ABC data. Share the pattern with the medical team. Treating pain first can cut problem behavior and boost skill performance.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a two-minute pain scan to your session prep: note facial tension, rubbing, or posture shifts and compare to the client's usual baseline.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Historically, individuals with intellectual disability (ID) have been excluded from pain research and assumed to be insensitive or indifferent to pain. The weight of the evidence suggests that individuals with ID have been subject to practices and procedures with little regard for their ability to experience or express pain. A number of issues central to improving understanding of pain in ID will be introduced and current research related to the definition of pain and its social context, underlying sensory and metabolic systems and factors influencing judgments about the ability to experience pain will be reviewed. Accumulating evidence from interdisciplinary research designed to improve assessment, understand individual differences, and evaluate bias and beliefs about pain suggests that new perspectives are emerging and beginning to shape an innovative frontier of research that will ultimately pay tremendous dividends for improving the quality of life of individuals with ID.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2008 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.01037.x