Assessment & Research

Personality profiles of youngsters with Prader-Willi syndrome and youngsters attending regular schools.

Curfs et al. (1995) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 1995
★ The Verdict

Kids with Prader-Willi syndrome show a calm-but-irritable, low-energy personality pattern that calls for low-stimulus setups and mood-friendly reinforcement.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running clinics or schools where even one child has Prader-Willi syndrome.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who work only with high-energy, socially motivated populations.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Davison et al. (1995) compared personality traits in kids with Prader-Willi syndrome to same-age peers in regular schools. They used the California Child Q-set to paint a picture of each child’s style. The sample was small, but the design matched each PWS child to a typical classmate for clear contrast.

02

What they found

Kids with PWS scored lower on extraversion and activity. They also showed higher irritability and mood swings. Some traits differed by gender and IQ, but the overall PWS profile stood apart from typical peers.

03

How this fits with other research

Plesa-Skwerer et al. (2004) extended the 1995 work by adding Williams syndrome to the mix. They found that kids with WS gave richer, more social self-descriptions than kids with PWS, confirming that PWS carries a unique, less social style. Dimitropoulos et al. (2024) built on the same profile by testing an 8-week remote play game. Children with PWS improved their play organization, showing that the low-activity trait can be moved with targeted practice. Rojahn et al. (2012) ran a parallel study with kids who had mixed psychiatric diagnoses. They also saw lower self-concept versus typical peers, but they used a different tool, so the numbers do not clash.

04

Why it matters

You now have a quick sketch of the PWS child: quieter, slower to warm up, quicker to irritate. Use it. Start sessions with fewer people in the room. Insert short movement breaks before the drowsy low-activity side kicks in. Pair new tasks with high-preference foods to buffer irritability. When you see a Williams paper claiming big social strengths, remember that finding does not apply here.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Cut room noise by half and pre-pack two 3-minute movement breaks before tabletop work.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
56
Population
other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

For the study of the personality profile of youngsters with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), a PWS group was compared with a matched group of youngsters attending regular school. The PWS group consisted of 28 youngsters (12 males and 16 females; mean age 11 years, 11 months). These youngsters were matched on gender and age level with 28 youngsters out of a group of 333 youngsters in regular school. Behaviour and personality characteristics of each youngster in both groups were described by both parents, using a Dutch version of the California Child Q-set (CCQ; Block & Block 1980). The present authors compared the scores of both groups on eight personality dimensions, derived from the aggregated CCQ-descriptions for fathers and mothers. The personality dimensions were Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness, Motor Activity, Irritability and Dependency. The authors investigated further individual differences of PWS youngsters on the same eight CCQ personality dimensions, considering gender and age level as well as IQ level and the presence or absence of a 15q11-q13 deletion. The personality profile of PWS youngsters was markedly different from youngsters in regular school. Some personality characteristics were related to gender and IQ. The lower level of physical activity in PWS girls without 15q11-q13 deletion needs further study.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1995 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00506.x