New interview and observation measures of the broader autism phenotype: group differentiation.
New interview tools spot autism-like traits in parents, especially fathers, but take longer than checklists and can inflate symptom reports.
01Research in Context
What this study did
de Jonge et al. (2015) built new interview and observation tools. They wanted to see if the tools could spot the broader autism phenotype in parents.
They compared two groups: parents of kids with autism and parents of kids with Down syndrome. They looked at how well the new tools told the groups apart.
What they found
The new measures worked. They clearly split the autism-parent group from the Down-syndrome-parent group.
Fathers showed the split more strongly than mothers. The tools caught autism-like traits better in dads.
How this fits with other research
Cox et al. (2015) tested the exact same interview battery and found it stayed consistent over time. Together the two papers show the tool is both reliable and valid.
Emerson et al. (2007) created the Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire, a quick checklist. Maretha’s new interview goes deeper but takes longer. You pick speed or depth.
Muller et al. (2022) adds a warning: parents who score high on any BAP measure tend to over-rate autism symptoms in their kids. Check parent BAP status before you trust caregiver reports.
Why it matters
If you need to know whether subtle autism traits run in a family, these interview tools give richer data than a checklist. Start with dads; the signal is clearer. Always pair parent reports with teacher or clinician data to avoid BAP-driven inflation. The tool is still new, so cross-validate with Down syndrome or other groups before using it alone.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add the social-communication & rigidity factor from these tools to your intake interview for fathers when family history is unclear.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
To identify the broader autism phenotype (BAP), the Family History Interview subject and informant versions and an observational tool (Impression of Interviewee), were developed. This study investigated whether the instruments differentiated between parents of children with autism, and parents of children with Down syndrome (DS). The BAP scores of parents of 28 multiplex autism families were compared with parents from, 32 DS families. The BAP measures provided good group differentiation but when considered together, the subject interview did not improve group differentiation. The differentiation was better for fathers than mothers. The measures do carry an important degree of validity; whether they can differentiate the BAP from other social disorders should be tested.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2015 · doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2230-7