Assessment & Research

'Name It to Tame It': Dementia Diagnostic Procedure in Austrian Care Facilities for People With Intellectual Disabilities. An Interview Study.

La Face et al. (2026) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2026
★ The Verdict

Good dementia tools exist for adults with ID, but Austrian care homes skip them—copy the proven tools and start using them.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who consult in residential homes or day programs for adults with intellectual disability.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve children or work in fully medical settings.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

La Face et al. (2026) talked to staff in Austrian care homes for people with intellectual disability.

They asked how workers spot possible dementia and what tools they use.

Thirty interviews showed most homes have no written steps for checking memory loss.

02

What they found

In 19 out of 30 cases staff suspected dementia but never ran an assessment.

Only three workers used a standard checklist; the rest trusted gut feelings.

Long-time caregivers were the first to notice small changes in daily habits.

03

How this fits with other research

Pettingell et al. (2022) already gave us ready-made tools: BPSD-DS, CS-DS, and CAMDEX-DS.

Those tools are made for carers to fill out, yet Austrian staff did not know them.

This looks like a contradiction—good tools exist but sit on the shelf.

Vrijmoeth et al. (2016) found the same trust in caregiver hunch when spotting palliative needs, so the pattern is wider than dementia.

04

Why it matters

You can fix this gap tomorrow. Pick one short informant tool from Pettingell et al. (2022), train your team, and add it to the annual plan. A fifteen-minute checklist beats years of guesswork and may cut unneeded meds.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Print the 8-item BPSD-DS, add it to your next staff meeting agenda, and role-play one mock rating with a long-time caregiver.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
qualitative
Sample size
30
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing relevance of dementia in people with intellectual disabilities, there are currently no national recommendations in Austria to inform diagnostic protocols within care facilities. In order to gain a state-of-the-art understanding of the issue, the aim of this study was to map out the process currently followed by formal caregivers when they suspect a person in their care has dementia. METHOD: We conducted 30 interviews with formal caregivers working in three care facilities for people with intellectual disabilities in Styria, an Austrian province. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using structured qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: In order to notice signs of early dementia and start the diagnostic process, a long-term relationship between formal caregivers and the person with intellectual disabilities appears to be crucial. Standardised observational instruments for monitoring changes were used by only three formal caregivers. In 19 out of 30 cases, no diagnostic assessment was carried out, even though dementia was suspected. CONCLUSIONS: To uphold the right to health for older adults with intellectual disabilities, policies and recommendations must be established in Austria to ensure timely and accurate dementia diagnoses. This requires the introduction of standardised observational and documentation tools, clear diagnostic pathways and specialist diagnostic centres.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026 · doi:10.1111/jir.70085