Assessment & Research

Mothers with intellectual impairment and their 9-month-old infants.

Hindmarsh et al. (2015) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2015
★ The Verdict

Nine-month babies of moms with ID develop typically, but later gaps can emerge, so stay alert and offer coaching plus concrete support.

✓ Read this if BCBAs doing early-intervention assessments or parent training in home or clinic settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who serve only older youth or adults with no parent-infant focus.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Little et al. (2015) tracked 9-month-old babies born to mothers with intellectual disability. They checked the babies' growth, play skills, and social responses. They also asked moms about their own health, money worries, and support.

The team compared these families with similar families where moms did not have ID. They wanted to see if early development looked different when mom has an intellectual disability.

02

What they found

The babies hit the same milestones as other 9-month-olds. Mental health scores for the moms were also the same. But the moms with ID were poorer, more often single, and in worse physical health.

In short, the infants were doing fine even though the moms carried heavier social loads.

03

How this fits with other research

Laposa et al. (2017) studied the same city cohort at age 3. By then the kids scored lower on language and showed more aggression, especially when family income was low. The 9-month picture was rosy; the 3-year picture was not. Development gaps can appear later, so keep watching.

Yuwiler et al. (1992) showed moms with ID can master parenting skills fast when they get clear coaching. G et al. saw no baby problems at 9 months, but the moms still face steep social odds. Training, not fear, is the response.

Eussen et al. (2016) found child health evened out once poverty was held constant. Together these studies say: mom's ID alone is not the risk factor; lack of money and support is.

04

Why it matters

Do not assume delay just because mom has ID. At 9 months, screen like you would any baby. Use that window to build trust, teach simple routines, and link families to cash, food, and childcare help. Re-check development again at 18 and 30 months; catch any slips early. Your teaching skills, not removal from the home, keep these families intact and kids on track.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add an 18-month re-screen reminder to your treatment plan for any baby of a mom with ID.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
74
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have utilised population-based data to examine the lives of families headed by parents with intellectual impairment. This study examined the health and social context of mothers with intellectual impairment compared with their peers without intellectual impairment, and the 9-month developmental outcomes of their infants. METHOD: Secondary analysis of the first wave of the United Kingdom's Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). Wave 1 data were collected when the child was 9 months of age and recorded in-depth information of maternal health, the social context in which the families live, and developmental outcomes of the infants. RESULTS: Of the 18 189 mothers, 74 (0.4%) were classified as mothers with intellectual impairment. The findings show evidence of widespread disadvantage in terms of social context and poorer self-reported physical health for mothers with intellectual impairment compared with their peers without intellectual impairment. Maternal mental health and the developmental outcomes of their 9-month infants were not markedly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-sectional analyses used in this study shows the differences in the lives of mothers with intellectual impairment and their young infants compared with their peers. Longitudinal analyses across subsequent waves of the MCS will allow protective and risk factors in the early years that influence later developmental outcomes to be identified.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2015 · doi:10.1111/jir.12159