Joint attention and early social communication: implications for research on intervention with autism.
Track small joint-attention shifts—eye-gaze, point, show—in preschool autism sessions; they reveal early gains that standard tests overlook.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Hanley et al. (1997) wrote a think-piece, not an experiment. They looked at every paper on joint attention and autism up to 1997. Their goal was to tell future researchers what to measure in early-intervention studies.
They said: stop relying only on IQ or language scores. Instead, watch how preschoolers with autism shift eye-gaze, point, or show toys. These tiny acts may catch progress that big tests miss.
What they found
The team found no new data. They built a map. The map shows that joint-attention skills sit in the middle of later language, play, and social growth. If you move joint attention, the rest may follow.
They urged teams to code three things: does the child look back and forth between toy and adult? does the child point to show? does the child share a smile while looking?
How this fits with other research
MacDonald et al. (2006) answered the call. They gave us a 15-minute play script that reaches high observer agreement. Use it to baseline and track joint attention in toddlers.
Bottema-Beutel (2016) pooled many studies and found the link is real. Responding to joint attention correlates with language gains more strongly in autism than in typical kids.
Burack et al. (2004) added a twist. More therapy hours only boost language for kids who already show some joint-attention skill. Kids with very low JA need different dose plans.
Why it matters
You can start tomorrow. Pick one routine—bubble play, book sharing, or snack. Mark every time the child looks from the item to your eyes, points to show, or gives a toy. Count these for five minutes. If the numbers rise, your program is working even before language scores move. Use the Rebecca et al. script if you want a free, reliable tool.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a 5-minute joint-attention tally to one daily play routine and graph the looks, points, and shows.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Highly structured, intensive early intervention may lead to significant developmental gains for many children with autism. However, a clear understanding of early intervention effects may currently be hampered by a lack of precision in outcome measurement. To improve the precision and sensitivity of outcome assessment it may be useful to integrate research on the nature of the social disturbance of autism with research on early intervention. In this regard, it may be that measures of nonverbal social communication skills are especially important in the study of preschool intervention programs. This is because these measures appear to tap into a cardinal component of the early social disturbance of autism, and because these measures have been directly related to neurological, cognitive, and affective processes that may play a role in autism. The research and theory that support the potential utility of these types of measures for early intervention research are reviewed. Examples are provided to illustrate how these types of measures may assist in addressing current issues and hypotheses about early intervention with autism including the "recovery hypothesis," the "pivotal skill hypothesis," and the relative effectiveness of discrete trial versus incidental learning approaches to early intervention. A cybernetic model of autism is also briefly described in an effort to better understand one potential component of early psychoeducational treatment effects with children with autism.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1997 · doi:10.1023/a:1025802832021