Assessment & Research

Identification of early risk factors for language impairment.

Stanton-Chapman et al. (2002) · Research in developmental disabilities 2002
★ The Verdict

Very low birth weight, low Apgar, and low maternal education are the strongest flags for later language impairment—screen these kids early.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who build early-intervention caseloads or advise pediatric clinics.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only older clients with established language skills.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

McIntyre et al. (2002) looked at birth records and later school records. They wanted to know which babies end up with language problems.

They checked things like birth weight, Apgar scores, and mom’s education. The study covered many kids across the United States.

02

What they found

Very low birth weight, low Apgar scores, and late prenatal care raised risk. So did high birth order and low maternal education.

Low maternal education and unmarried status hit the whole population hardest. These two flags matter most when you plan screenings.

03

How this fits with other research

Stewart et al. (2018) extends these birth flags into school. They show many 7- and 11-year-olds with poor vocabulary still slip past teachers. Birth risk lists are only step one; you still need school-wide language checks.

Fahmie et al. (2013) used the same big-cohort style but tracked intellectual disability instead of language. Again, mom’s education stayed predictive after removing genetic cases. The pattern repeats across diagnoses.

DeRoma et al. (2004) found nearly identical red flags in Pakistan: maternal illiteracy and small head size. Risk factors look similar around the world.

04

Why it matters

You can spot likely language trouble before kindergarten. Flag every child born very small, with low Apgar, or whose mother left school early. Add them to your early-language screening list. Do not wait for teacher concern; Stewart et al. (2018) prove many will be missed.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pull your birth-risk roster and schedule language screens for any child marked VLBW, low Apgar, or low maternal education.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
244619
Population
developmental delay
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The current study is a population-based investigation of birth risk factors for school-identified specific language impairment (SLI). The sample consisted of 244,619 students (5,862 SLI) born in Florida between 1989 and 1990 who were in the Florida public school system at ages 6-7. Epidemiological measures of effect were used to investigate both individual- and population-level risk for SLI. Very low birth weight (VLBW), low 5-min Apgar score, late or no prenatal care, high birth order, and low maternal education were associated with highest individual-level risk. Low maternal education and having an unmarried mother was associated with the highest population-level risk. The results not only suggest who needs to be screened for a future developmental disability, but identify a group of children who are at-risk for an SLI placement in school. Early intervention services for these children may be the most effective approach to reducing the incidence of school-identified SLI.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2002 · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(02)00141-5