Assessment & Research

How relevant are GFAP autoantibodies in autism and Tourette Syndrome?

Kirkman et al. (2008) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2008
★ The Verdict

GFAP antibody levels do not flag autism or Tourette’s, so strike this test from your medical referral list.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who get parent requests for “biomedical testing” to explain behavior.
✗ Skip if Clinicians already focused on skill-based assessment and treatment.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Doctors drew blood from people with autism, Tourette syndrome, and typical controls. They measured antibodies that attack GFAP, a brain-support protein.

The team wanted to know if these antibodies cause autism or tics. They compared levels across the three groups.

02

What they found

Antibody levels were the same in every group. High or low titers did not track with diagnosis.

The authors say GFAP antibodies are innocent bystanders, not disease drivers.

03

How this fits with other research

Song et al. (2024) and Nijs et al. (2016) also found no autism signal in two other brain chemicals, GABA and glutathione. Together the papers shrink the list of single-molecule blood tests that will ever help you screen for ASD.

Rosenspire et al. (2011) looks like a contradiction. They did find higher anti-TG2 antibodies in some autistic kids. The difference is target: TG2 antibodies link to gut autoimmunity and certain HLA genes, while GFAP antibodies do not. Same blood, different story.

Root et al. (2017) and Marchese et al. (2012) add more nulls. Urine IAG and gut microbiota also fail to split autism from typical. The pattern is clear: easy single biomarkers keep coming up empty.

04

Why it matters

You can skip GFAP antibody tests when families ask about “biomedical” workups. Save money and time. Focus your assessments on skill-based data—language samples, VB-MAPP, functional analyses—instead of hunting blood markers that science keeps ruling out.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

When a parent mentions GFAP or other antibody tests, show them this null result and pivot to discussing functional behavior assessment.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
108
Population
autism spectrum disorder, tourette syndrome, neurotypical
Finding
null

03Original abstract

Controversy exists over the role of autoantibodies to central nervous system antigens in autism and Tourette Syndrome. We investigated plasma autoantibody titers to glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in children with classic onset (33) and regressive onset (26) autism, controls (25, healthy age- and gender-matched) and individuals with Tourette Syndrome (24) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. We found a significant difference in autoantibody titers to GFAP, not accounted for by age, between the Tourette (significantly lower) and regressive autism groups. However, no differences were found between: classic/regressive; classic/controls; classic/Tourette; regressive/controls; or controls/Tourette. Autoantibody responses against GFAP are unlikely to play a pathogenic role in autism or Tourette Syndrome.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2008 · doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0398-9