Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior evoked by noise.
Test noise as a trigger with a mini functional analysis, then use escape extinction plus gradual volume fading to wipe out noise-based problem behavior.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with two children who had developmental delays. Both kids hit, screamed, or threw things when they heard everyday noises like vacuum cleaners or hand dryers.
First the researchers ran a short functional analysis. They played noise for a few seconds. If the child asked for a break or covered their ears, the noise stopped right away. Problem behavior jumped only in this noise condition, so the team knew noise was the real trigger.
What they found
After the test, treatment took 5–10 sessions. The adults no longer let the kids escape when noise played. They also started the sound very soft and slowly made it louder while the children stayed at the table.
Both children’s problem behavior dropped to near zero. Parents later said the gains held at home and were still strong weeks later.
How this fits with other research
Lowe et al. (1974) showed that rats will work to turn off loud noise only if the noise was first paired with shock. Meuret et al. (2001) now show that noise alone can evoke problem behavior in children without any shock history. The two studies line up: once noise is proven aversive through a functional analysis, escape extinction works for both species.
Newman et al. (2021) tried non-contingent snacks instead of escape extinction for escape-maintained behavior. Some kids improved, others did not. Meuret et al. (2001) add clear evidence that when noise is the trigger, blocking escape plus fading the volume is a reliable choice.
Why it matters
If a client melts down around vacuums, blenders, or school bells, run a 5-minute noise test before writing a behavior plan. When the functional analysis shows noise is the culprit, stop letting the child leave the area. Start the sound barely audible and raise it bit by bit while the child uses headphones, tasks, or DRO. This pairing cuts problem behavior and travels home with them.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one everyday noise the parent mentions, play it softly during table work, and do not let the child leave; increase volume 5 dB every 2 minutes while praising calm sitting.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We conducted a four-part investigation to develop methods for assessing and treating problem behavior evoked by noise. In Phase 1, 7 participants with developmental disabilities who were described as being hypersensitive to specific noises were exposed to a series of noises under controlled conditions. Results for 2 of the participants verified that noise was apparently an aversive event. In Phase 2, results of functional analyses indicated that these 2 participants' problem behaviors were maintained by escape from noise. In Phase 3, preference assessments were conducted to identify reinforcers that might be used during treatment. Finally, in Phase 4, the 2 participants' problem behaviors were successfully treated with extinction, stimulus fading, and a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior (DRO) contingency (only 1 participant required DRO). Treatment effects for both participants generalized to their home environments and were maintained during a follow-up assessment. Procedures and results were discussed in terms of their relevance to the systematic assessment of noise as an establishing operation (EO) and, more generally, to the identification of idiosyncratic EO influences on behavior.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2001 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-447