Factors associated with the participation of children with complex communication needs.
For AAC users, the child's emotional confidence and the family's disability load predict participation better than any diagnosis or motor score.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers asked the kids who use AAC devices about their daily lives. They wanted to know which child traits and family factors predict how often the kids join in everyday activities.
The team used parent surveys to measure participation, emotional self-confidence, and family stress. Kids had diagnoses like cerebral palsy, autism, or Down syndrome.
What they found
Two things stood out. Kids who believed they could handle their own emotions joined in more activities. Families who felt less crushed by disability also had kids who participated more.
The child's motor or IQ scores did not predict participation. Emotional skills and family impact beat impairment severity.
How this fits with other research
Chen et al. (2014) found the same pattern in kids with cerebral palsy. Child behavior problems and caregiver stress shaped quality of life more than how well the child could move.
Lin et al. (2026) looked at 3,500 Taiwanese youth with autism. Again, communication deficits and caregiver support—not physical issues—drove participation gaps. The results line up across three countries and diagnoses.
Giofrè et al. (2014) add a twist: families under money or social pressure struggle no matter how severe the child's behavior. So cash help and friend networks may be pre-requisites for the emotional gains to stick.
Why it matters
Before you write goals, screen emotional self-efficacy and family impact. A fifteen-minute checklist can flag kids who will sit out unless you boost coping skills. Pair AAC training with parent stress management or respite funds. When families feel less burdened, kids jump into more activities without you ever targeting motor skills.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add two questions to your intake: 'My child can calm himself when upset' and 'Disability affects our family routines'—score 1-5 and prioritize the lowest numbers for intervention.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The aim of this study was to conduct a preliminary analysis of relations between child and environmental variables, including factors related to communication aid provision, and participation in informal everyday activities in a sample of children with complex communication needs. Ninety-seven caregivers of children provided with communication aids responded to a questionnaire survey. Child variables assessed were level of ability, trait emotional self-efficacy, and competence in communication aid use. Environmental variables assessed were the impact of childhood disability on the family, family socio-economic category, perceived reliability of electronic communication aids provided to children, and ease of use of the aid. The outcome measure was the intensity of child participation in informal activities. Significant correlations were observed between participation scores and the following variables: child age, level of ability, trait emotional self-efficacy, and family impact of childhood disability. Regression analyses highlighted trait emotional self-efficacy and, to a lesser degree, family impact of childhood disability as the strongest potential predictors of participation. While aspects of child personality may be difficult to disentangle from behaviours related to disability type or developmental age, this research highlights a clinical requirement to assess systematically child behaviours relating to their general emotional functioning.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2011 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.002