Factorial validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (age band 2).

Wagner et al. (2011) checked if the Movement ABC-2 age band 2 really has three parts. They ran a confirmatory factor analysis on the test scores.

Age band 2 covers kids roughly 7–10 years old. The test claims to measure Manual Dexterity, Aiming & Catching, and Balance.

The three-factor model fit the data well enough. The test structure held up for this age group.

Still, the authors warn that we need more studies before using the scores to decide if a child has developmental coordination disorder.

Schulz et al. (2011) ran the same math on all three age bands in the same year. They also found the three-subscale model works, but factor patterns get messier as kids get older. Together, the two papers back the test’s bones.

Zoia et al. (2019) later repeated the check in Italian kids. Cultural motor habits shifted scores on 11 of 27 tasks, so local norms may be needed. The structure still held, extending the UK finding abroad.

Sasson et al. (2022) moved the lens to adults, validating a German DCD checklist that also sorts into three factors. The theme repeats: three-factor motor tools travel across ages and languages, yet small tweaks are often required.

You can feel safe using the M-ABC-2 age band 2 three-scale profile to describe motor skill patterns. Just remember: good structure does not equal a diagnosis. Pair the test with clinical observation, and watch for new local norms if you work with kids from different motor cultures.