Assessment & Research

Facial attraction: an exploratory study of the judgements made by people with intellectual disabilities.

Donnachie et al. (2021) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2021
★ The Verdict

Adults with mild ID judge facial attractiveness the same way neurotypical adults do—use this knowledge when discussing relationships and social skills.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing dating or friendship programs for adults with mild ID.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only children or severe-profound ID.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team asked adults with mild intellectual disability to look at photos of faces.

Each person rated how good-looking the faces were.

A comparison group of adults without ID did the same task.

The goal was to see if the two groups use the same rules for judging attractiveness.

02

What they found

Both groups picked the same faces as attractive.

Adults with ID agreed with their non-ID peers almost completely.

The surprise: adults with ID rated their own looks higher than the other group did.

They saw themselves as more desirable than outsiders saw them.

03

How this fits with other research

Tonnsen et al. (2016) found adults with ID struggle to read facial emotions.

That study showed worse performance even when matched for mental age.

The new study seems opposite: attractiveness judgments were spot-on.

The gap makes sense: reading feelings and judging beauty use different brain paths.

Reyes et al. (2017) showed picture tasks work well with this population.

Their arousal study used photos and got clear data without scary machines.

Geurts et al. (2008) showed social skills predict life happiness for adults with ID.

Knowing they judge faces like everyone else gives a base for teaching those skills.

04

Why it matters

You can talk about dating, marriage, and social media photos without dumbing down the idea of attractiveness.

Use regular pictures in social stories; the client already sees them the same way you do.

Build confidence by noting their positive self-views, then teach how to approach others safely.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Start your next social group with a short photo-rating ice-breaker to show clients their views match everyone else’s.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
58
Population
intellectual disability, neurotypical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Although romantic or sexual attraction is a major research topic in the general population, little is known about people with intellectual disabilities' (ID) views of attractiveness. METHODS: Fifty-eight participants (16-40 years) took part in this exploratory study, 29 with ID and 29 without ID. Participants were shown 50 images of men or women's faces and asked to rate how attractive they thought the faces were. RESULTS: A strong association was found between what men and women with ID and those without ID considered attractive in romantic partners. However, people with ID were more likely to consider themselves desirable to others. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that people with mild ID make the same subtle judgements about facial attraction as other individuals.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2021 · doi:10.1111/jir.12823