Assessment & Research

Exploring the Broader Autism Phenotype: How Alexithymia Impacts Recognition of Facial Expressions of Pain.

Mosalmannejad et al. (2025) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2025
★ The Verdict

Alexithymia, not autistic traits, slows recognition of pain in faces.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching emotion recognition to teens or adults with sub-clinical autistic features.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working with non-verbal or diagnosed ASD clients who already show clear gaze avoidance.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team asked 60 college students to watch faces showing pain. Half the group had high autistic traits, half had low. No one had an autism diagnosis.

Each face faded in from a blank screen. Students pressed a key the moment they saw pain. Eye cameras tracked where they looked. Everyone also filled out an alexithymia scale.

The goal was simple: do autistic traits change how fast you spot pain, and does alexithymia matter more?

02

What they found

Speed was the same. High-trait and low-trait groups hit the key equally fast. Eye cameras showed no group difference in time spent on eyes, mouth, or face.

The only standout was alexithymia. Students who scored high on “difficulty describing feelings” needed stronger pain signals before they noticed. Autistic traits alone added zero extra delay.

In plain words, trouble naming your own feelings predicts trouble seeing pain in others.

03

How this fits with other research

Bothe et al. (2019) saw the same pattern for happy, sad, and angry faces. In that study, autistic social traits only hurt accuracy when alexithymia was also high. The new pain data extend the story: the link holds even when the emotion is a basic survival cue.

Spanoudis et al. (2011) reported that autistic adults look less at eyes and this drop hurts face reading. The current study found no gaze differences. The gap disappears because the 2025 sample is broader-phenotype, not diagnosed ASD. When you screen out clinical-level social impairment, eye-time evens out.

Vabalas et al. (2016) add a twist. They showed that higher autistic traits shrink visual exploration during live chat. Together the three papers paint a rule: gaze problems show up in real social give-and-take, not in short lab clips of pain.

04

Why it matters

If a client misses that someone is hurt, check alexithymia first. A short questionnaire like the TAS-20 takes five minutes and predicts the blind spot better than an autism trait score.

For social-skills training, skip generic “look at the eyes” drills when gaze is already typical. Target emotion vocabulary instead: teach words for bodily feelings so clients can map them onto faces. One quick start is to pause videos at wince moments and practice labeling intensity on a 1-5 “pain scale” before moving to live role play.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale to your intake packet and use the score to decide whether to run extra pain-labeling drills.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
462
Population
not specified
Finding
null

03Original abstract

PURPOSE: Autism spectrum disorder has been associated with deficits in socio-emotional interactions; however, research results are not homogenous in this regard. To explain this variety of observations, the alexithymia hypothesis suggests that impaired emotion processing in autism is due to co-occurring alexithymia. Furthermore, while DSM-5 references altered responses to painful stimuli in individuals with autism, the discussion continues regarding their ability in recognizing painful facial expressions. The Broader Autism Phenotype theory also posits that ASD represents an extreme of a spectrum of autistic traits present in the general population. This study investigates the perceptual sensitivity threshold for recognizing painful facial expressions and gaze behavior among individuals with high and low autistic traits. METHODS: A total of 462 participants completed the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ-50) and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Among them, 35 individuals were assigned to the high-AQ group (66% female) and 31 were assigned to the low-AQ group (68% female). Participants performed a facial expression recognition task and had their eye movements recorded, then completed the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. RESULTS: Results revealed no significant differences between groups in sensitivity thresholds or visual attention patterns, although a notable correlation existed between alexithymia and sensitivity thresholds. CONCLUSION: These findings support the alexithymia hypothesis, indicating that difficulties in recognizing pain through facial expressions relate to alexithymia, not to autistic traits. Specifically, our results contradict previous studies suggesting reduced gaze duration at faces in autistic individuals.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025 · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.021