Assessment & Research

Examining the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorder-71 as an assessment tool for anxiety in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

van Steensel et al. (2013) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2013
★ The Verdict

Raise the parent cutoff on the SCARED-71 for high-functioning autistic kids to reduce false positives.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who screen for anxiety in school-age or clinic clients with ASD.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working with non-verbal or severe ASD where self- or parent-report is not feasible.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team tested the SCARED-71 anxiety checklist in high-functioning autistic kids. They asked parents and children to fill out the same 71-item form. Then they checked if the scores matched known anxiety levels.

The goal was to see if the regular cutoffs work or if autism skews the numbers.

02

What they found

Parent reports lined up fairly well with clinical anxiety. Child reports did not. Using the usual parent cutoff flagged too many kids as anxious. Raising the cutoff caught the truly anxious ones and cut false alarms.

03

How this fits with other research

Adams et al. (2022) saw the same problem with the SRAS-R school-refusal scale. Parents said the standard form missed autism reasons like sensory breaks. Both papers end with the same fix: tweak the tool for ASD.

Van Gaasbeek et al. (2026) found the opposite with the sleep scale SDSC. The five-factor shape held perfectly in 513 autistic youth. The difference is domain: sleep questions behave the same; anxiety questions do not.

Bitsika et al. (2017) add that anxiety looks different by age in ASD. Social tension drives worry in younger boys; routine change drives it in teens. The SCARED-71 does not capture these shifts, so a higher cutoff is only a first step.

04

Why it matters

You probably screen for anxiety before starting social-skills or CBT groups. If you use the stock SCARED-71 parent cutoff, you may over-identify. Bump the threshold until local data say stop. Pair the score with interview questions about social tension and routine change to sharpen your picture.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add five points to the SCARED-71 parent cutoff you currently use and track whether referral numbers drop without missing kids who need help.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
237
Population
autism spectrum disorder, anxiety disorder
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

The psychometric properties of a questionnaire developed to assess symptoms of anxiety disorders (SCARED-71) were compared between two groups of children: children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and comorbid anxiety disorders (ASD-group; n = 115), and children with anxiety disorders (AD-group; n = 122). Anxiety disorders were established with a semi-structured interview (ADIS-C/P), using child- as well as parent-report. Internal consistency, construct validity, sensitivity, specificity, and discriminant validity of the SCARED-71 was investigated. Results revealed that the psychometric properties of the SCARED-71 for the ASD-group were quite comparable to the AD-group, however, the discriminant validity of the SCARED-71 child-report was less in the ASD-group. Raising the parental cutoffs of the SCARED-71 resulted in higher specificity rates, which suggests that research should focus more on establishing alternative cutoffs for the ASD-population.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2013 · doi:10.1177/1362361312455875