Examining Sensitivity to Developmental Changes on the Behavioral Inflexibility Scale.
The BIS picks up developmental change in everyday inflexibility, so you can measure growth without extra testing.
01Research in Context
What this study did
A Boyd et al. (2024) asked a simple question: does the Behavioral Inflexibility Scale (BIS) notice real growth in autistic kids?
Parents filled out the 16-item BIS twice, one year apart. No extra teaching or drugs were given.
The team then checked if the scores moved enough to say, "Yes, this child is more flexible now."
What they found
Scores did shift. The BIS caught developmental change over twelve months.
That means the tool is sensitive, not stuck on the first number it sees.
How this fits with other research
Harrop et al. (2024) used the same scale and showed BIS numbers forecast anxiety better than age, IQ, or label. Brian’s team adds, "And those numbers also move as kids grow."
Fecteau et al. (2003) first showed core autism traits can ease with time. Brian’s work zooms in on one trait—inflexibility—and gives us a ruler to watch it change.
Strang et al. (2017) built a different parent scale called the Flexibility Scale. Both tools chase the same skill, so you can pick either; just stay consistent.
Why it matters
You now have a free, quick parent form that tracks real-world rigidity over months. Use it at intake, then again every six to twelve months. If the score drops, celebrate and keep the plan. If it stalls, teach flexibility skills or probe for hidden anxiety. One page, one number, clear direction.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Print the BIS, file the first score, and calendar a re-check in six months.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
PURPOSE: The study objective was to determine if the validated Behavioral Inflexibility Scale (BIS) is sensitive to the detection of developmental changes in inflexibility in a sample of autistic children. METHODS: Parents of autistic children (n = 146, 3-17 years) completed the BIS at two time points, one year apart, to examine change. RESULTS: The findings indicate the BIS is sensitive to the detection of developmental changes and that child-level variables are not associated with those changes. Children's Time 1 BIS scores predicted children's severity on an independent outcome measure. Finally, a relationship between total services children were receiving and change in BIS scores over time was not found. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest the BIS is a reasonable candidate for consideration as an outcome measure.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2024 · doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05837-z