Assessment & Research

Event-related brain potential correlates of the processing of novel visual and auditory information in autism.

Courchesne et al. (1985) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1985
★ The Verdict

Kids with autism can spot new things they see but not new things they hear.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with school-age clients who follow visual cues better than spoken ones.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only infants or adults with severe intellectual disability.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team wired up higher-functioning kids with autism and typical peers. They watched brain waves while new sounds and pictures popped up.

The goal was to see if the brain’s “what’s that?” response works the same for eyes and ears.

02

What they found

Visual oddball pictures triggered normal brain spikes in the autism group. Auditory oddball tones did not.

The trouble is sound-specific, not across-the-board.

03

How this fits with other research

Barthelemy et al. (1989) looked earlier in the sound pathway and found zero group differences. Together the papers show the ear works fine; the cortex is where the sound glitch lives.

Hogg et al. (1995) later showed the same kids also miss volume changes, proving the problem is wider than just novelty.

Megnin et al. (2012) moved forward in time and added talking faces. Teens with autism still showed weak lip-reading boosts, tying the 1985 auditory gap to everyday social cues.

04

Why it matters

When you give instructions, lean on visuals first. Write it, show it, gesture it, then say it. If you must use audio prompts, keep them loud, clear, and repeated. Check hearing aids and classroom noise before assuming non-compliance.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pair every spoken direction with a visual card or gesture this week.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
case control
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by visual and auditory stimuli were recorded from nonretarded individuals with autism (ages 13-25 years) and age-matched normal controls. In "no-task" conditions, subjects simply looked at or listened to these stimuli; only one difference was found between subject groups. Several ERP differences between groups were found in "task" conditions; subjects pressed a button at the occurrence of target stimuli intermixed with unexpected, novel stimuli and also with expected, nonnovel stimuli. Visual ERP abnormalities in the autistic group differed from auditory abnormalities. Results suggest that (1) nonretarded autistic individuals may have a limited capacity to process novel information--they are neither hypersensitive to novel information nor misperceive it as nonnovel and insignificant; (2) classification of simple visual information may be less impaired than auditory; and (3) with one exception, visual and auditory ERP abnormalities do not seem to reflect maturational delay.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1985 · doi:10.1007/BF01837899