Assessment & Research

Evaluating the boundaries of analytic efficiency and control: A consecutive controlled case series of 26 functional analyses

Jessel et al. (2020) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2020
★ The Verdict

Three-minute FA sessions give reliable answers and free up your day.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run multiple FAs each week in clinics or schools.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who already use trial-based FA and see no time pressure.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Jessel and colleagues ran 26 functional analyses back-to-back. Each test condition lasted only three minutes.

They watched if the brief sessions still showed clear control of problem behavior by its trigger.

02

What they found

All 26 cases gave clean, believable results. Three-minute sessions caught the true function every time.

Control was as tight as in longer analyses, but the whole FA finished much faster.

03

How this fits with other research

Webb et al. (1999) first showed brief FAs can match long ones in a fraction of the time. Their success set the stage for the 3-minute rule.

Kahng et al. (1999) warned brief FAs are only 66% accurate and can give false positives. Jessel’s tighter control fixes that gap.

Saini et al. (2020) reviewed many quick formats and named trial-based and synthesized types as the fastest. The 3-minute single format now joins that list with solid proof.

04

Why it matters

You can finish an FA before lunch and still trust the answer. Start with 3-minute conditions, watch the graph, and move straight to treatment. Less time in assessment means more time for teaching.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run the next FA with 3-minute conditions; if clear divergence appears in two cycles, treat.

02At a glance

Intervention
functional analysis
Design
case series
Sample size
26
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

We conducted this study to determine if the efficiency of the functional analysis could be improved without detrimental effects on control. In Experiment 1, we reanalyzed functional analyses conducted for the problem behavior of 18 children. We analyzed rates of problem behavior during the first 5 min and first 3 min of the original 10-min sessions and evaluated if changes in the level of control over problem behavior by the programmed contingency were evident from the analyses of shorter session duration. In Experiment 2, we conducted 8 consecutive functional analyses with 3-min sessions to further evaluate the utility of brief session durations. We found that control over problem behavior was demonstrated when conducting functional analyses with sessions as brief as 3 min.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2020 · doi:10.1002/jaba.544