Evaluating Sex Differences in Language Abilities Within Down Syndrome and Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Girls with Down syndrome show stronger parent-reported language than boys with Down syndrome, but sex differences in autism are subtle and task-dependent.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Parents filled out a language survey about their kids. The sample included children with Down syndrome, autism, and typical development. Researchers then looked for sex differences in the parent ratings.
What they found
Girls with Down syndrome scored higher on parent-reported language than boys with Down syndrome. In the autism and typical groups, boys and girls looked the same.
How this fits with other research
Kocher et al. (2015) and Matheis et al. (2019) also found no sex gap in toddlers with autism. Those studies looked at younger kids and matched IQ scores, which may hide small language differences.
Conlon et al. (2019) and Kauschke et al. (2016) show a different picture. When they asked school-age girls with autism to tell stories, the girls used richer language than boys. Parent surveys may miss these fine details.
Oates et al. (2023) scoping review ties it together. Autistic girls often outscore autistic boys on structural language, but both groups lag behind typical girls. The new survey data line up with that big-picture view.
Why it matters
If you test a girl with Down syndrome, expect her language to look stronger than a boy of the same age. In autism, sex differences are smaller and may only pop up on detailed tasks like storytelling. Use narrative probes, not just parent forms, to spot them.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a short story-retell task to your language battery for autistic girls; parent forms alone may miss their pragmatic strengths.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Down syndrome (DS) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are two neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by impairments in language. Most studies do not consider the possible role sex differences may play in language profiles. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate whether parent-reported structural and pragmatic language vary as a function of sex in youth with DS (n = 37), ASD (n = 106), and typical development (TD; n = 61). Findings suggest a female advantage in both structural and pragmatic language in DS; in contrast, no sex differences were found for either ASD or TD. Results suggest that males with DS may require more extensive interventions for language. Future research should investigate how age, IQ, and mode of measurement may impact the nature of these observations.
Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2025 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-63.1.29