Does instrumentation have an effect on the outcome of a bimanual performance assessment in children with cerebral palsy?
Motion-capture cameras leave AHA scores untouched, so you can add kinematic data at no validity cost.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team asked a simple question. Does adding motion-capture cameras change the scores kids get on the Assisting Hand Assessment?
They tested children with cerebral palsy twice. One session used the normal AHA. The other session added ceiling cameras that tracked every hand move.
Then they compared the two sets of scores to see if the extra tech shifted the results.
What they found
The scores were almost identical. The cameras did not raise or lower the ratings in any meaningful way.
Inter-rater reliability stayed high, so different observers still agreed. The tool stayed valid even with the fancy gear running.
How this fits with other research
Gilchrist et al. (2018) and Lotfizadeh et al. (2020) both strapped sensors to kids and still kept valid data. Julie et al. now show the same holds when the sensors hang from the ceiling instead of the body.
Holm et al. (2013) warned that the MABC-2 can give wildly different scores from one rater to the next. The new study answers that worry for the AHA: adding cameras did not add noise.
Angelina et al. (2025) found that masks during ADOS-2 hardly moved the numbers. Together these papers build a rule: small changes in how we watch do not wreck good tools.
Why it matters
You can now collect rich movement data without buying extra time or risking score drift. Use the regular AHA protocol, flip on the cameras, and you get joint angles, speed, and smoothness for free. This lets you track tiny changes therapy might be making, something the plain checklist cannot show. Just check that your camera view is wide enough and keep the same two raters; the study shows those steps keep scores stable.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Record your next AHA session on a phone or ceiling camera and save the video file with the score sheet.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: In the majority of instrumented assessments of upper limb function, participants are frequently required to complete tasks in a standardised manner in order to facilitate inter-participant comparisons. However, this approach may result in the loss of valuable information regarding the patient's performance in everyday life. The instrumented performance assessment of the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) could yield meaningful information about the patient's spontaneous use of the impaired limb. This study aims to determine if the presence of a motion analysis setting impacts AHA scores in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. METHODS: Eighteen children (18 months-13 years) underwent regular and instrumented AHA sessions (7 Vicon cameras, 17 markers). The ratings of the AHAs were randomly divided for each participant between two occupational therapists. Descriptive statistics were employed, including a Bland-Altman plot with a clinical difference threshold of at least 5 points out of 100. Additionally, paired Student's t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were conducted based on data normality. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability for the AHA was high (maximum difference of 2 out of 80 points). No significant differences were found between instrumented and regular AHA scores, and no correlation with the age. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating motion capture into the AHA without compromising its reliability, regardless of the participants' age. Future research should focus on developing methods for reliably quantifying movement parameters within the AHA framework.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2025 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105057