Assessment & Research

Does central coherence relate to the cognitive performance of children with autism in dynamic assessments?

Aljunied et al. (2013) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2013
★ The Verdict

Autistic children with weak central coherence and low nonverbal IQ show smaller gains on mediated dynamic tests, so interpret their scores carefully.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who use dynamic assessment or plan instruction for late-elementary students with autism.
✗ Skip if Practitioners only using static IQ tests with verbal adults.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Mariam and colleagues gave a dynamic test to autistic children. A dynamic test gives short teaching bites and then retests to see how much the child gains from help.

They also measured two things: central coherence (how well the child sees the big picture) and nonverbal IQ. Then they asked, do these scores predict how much the child gains?

02

What they found

Every child improved after the mini-lessons. Yet kids with weak central coherence plus low nonverbal IQ improved less than their peers.

In plain words, the same help lifted some kids higher while others stayed closer to their first score.

03

How this fits with other research

Ohan et al. (2015) tracked toddlers with autism and found that many scored in the average range years later. Their message: early low scores can grow. Mariam’s team adds a warning: if both coherence and nonverbal IQ are low, growth during a brief test may still look small.

Courchesne et al. (2019) showed that strength-based tools reveal more ability in minimally verbal preschoolers. Together these papers tell us to pick tests that fit the child’s profile and to expect smaller gains when coherence and IQ are both weak.

Milgramm et al. (2021) found that teachers rate classroom competence by the same skills Mariam flagged: cognitive ability and social skills. The lab result and the classroom view line up—low NVIQ signals slower learning across settings.

04

Why it matters

When you give dynamic tests, check both central coherence and nonverbal IQ first. If both are weak, interpret small gains as a measurement issue, not a learning ceiling. Use this info to adjust teaching steps, not to lower goals.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Before your next dynamic test, quickly screen nonverbal IQ and central coherence; if both are low, break teaching bites into even smaller steps and allow extra mediation trials.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
pre post no control
Sample size
52
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Central coherence refers to an in-built propensity to form meaningful links over a wide range of stimuli and to generalize over as wide a range of contexts as possible. In children with autism this ability is diminished, and the impact of central coherence deficits in children with autism have previously been observed using static measures of learning, such as reading comprehension test performance. In this study, the relationship between central coherence and more dynamic indicators of learning are investigated. The responses of 52 children with autism (mean age 9:10 years) on a test of central coherence and a dynamic assessment task were analysed. All the children showed significant improvements in dynamic assessment test scores after mediation; however, among those with below average nonverbal intelligence scores, weak central coherence was significantly associated with smaller gains in performance after teaching. Implications for the validity of dynamic assessments for children with autism are discussed.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2013 · doi:10.1177/1362361311409960