Assessment & Research

Corticospinal excitability during motor imagery is reduced in young adults with developmental coordination disorder.

Hyde et al. (2018) · Research in developmental disabilities 2018
★ The Verdict

Motor imagery fails in DCD because the motor cortex stays silent, so don’t rely on mental practice alone.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing motor programs for teens or adults with coordination disorders.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with preschool language or feeding goals.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Zhou et al. (2018) asked young adults with and without developmental coordination disorder to imagine moving their hand.

While the adults pictured the action, the team zapped the brain area that moves the hand.

They checked if the zap made the hand muscle twitch more, a sign the motor cortex was busy.

02

What they found

Only the typical adults showed bigger twitches during imagery.

The DCD group showed no extra excitability, meaning their motor cortex stayed quiet.

This suggests their brain does not rehearse movement well, even when they try to picture it.

03

How this fits with other research

Piedimonte et al. (2018) saw the same weak imagery in adults with autism, so the problem crosses diagnoses.

Chen et al. (2018) also found slower hand imagery in teens with ASD, backing up the inefficiency pattern.

Bieber et al. (2023) extended the idea to younger kids, showing DCD also hurts watching and copying moves.

Spruijt et al. (2013) looked at kids with cerebral palsy and saw normal imagery timing, which seems opposite.

The difference is method: CP kids were tested on walking duration, not brain excitability, so the tasks measure different layers of imagery.

04

Why it matters

If the motor cortex does not light up during imagery, your client may not benefit from "just picture it" prompts.

Try short, concrete video models first, then add physical practice.

Check imagery success with simple tasks like hand rotation before you build it into chaining or sports programs.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Test one imagery trial: ask the client to imagine squeezing a ball, then watch for actual finger twitch; no twitch means switch to video modeling and physical rehearsal.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
case control
Sample size
29
Population
developmental delay
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

While a compelling body of behavioral research suggests that individuals with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) experience difficulties engaging motor imagery (MI), very little is known about the neural correlates of this deficit. Since corticospinal excitability is a predictor of MI proficiency in healthy adults, we reasoned that decreased MI efficiency in DCD may be paralleled by atypical primary motor cortex (PMC) activity. Participants were 29 young adults aged 18- 36 years: 8 with DCD (DCD) and 21 controls. Six participants with DCD and 15 controls showed behavioral profiles consistent with the use of a MI strategy (MI users) while performing a novel adaptation of the classic hand laterality task (HLT). Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was administered to the hand node of the left PMC (hPMC) at 50ms, 400ms or 650ms post stimulus presentation during the HLT. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) via electromyography. As predicted, MI users with DCD were significantly less efficient than MI using controls, shown by poorer performance on the HLT. Importantly, unlike healthy controls, no evidence of enhanced hPMC activity during MI was detected in our DCD group. Our data are consistent with the view that inefficient MI in DCD may be subserved by decreased hPMC activity. These findings are an important step towards clarifying the neuro-cognitive correlates of poor MI ability and motor skill in individuals with DCD.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2018 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.11.009