Concurrent validity of Open‐Ended Functional Assessment Interviews with functional analysis
A quick caregiver interview picks the right function three times out of four—good odds for shaping your first FA condition.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Four kids with autism took part. Each child first had an open-ended caregiver interview.
Right after, the team ran a standard functional analysis (FA) with four conditions.
They compared the interview guess to the FA result to see if they matched.
What they found
The interview gave the correct function in 3 out of 4 cases.
That is 74 % agreement—good enough to plan your first FA test conditions.
How this fits with other research
Bailey et al. (2021) also looked at caregiver reports. They fed QABF data into a computer model and got even better accuracy. Their work extends this idea: machines can sharpen parent guesses.
Morrison et al. (2017) found parent reports of toddler skills line up with direct tests. Their null result supports using parent words as a starting point, just like Gossou does for behavior function.
Bong et al. (2021) showed a 10-minute caregiver interview can flag ASD risk. Together these papers say: short parent talks are cheap, fast, and surprisingly solid screeners.
Why it matters
You can save time. Start with an open-ended interview, pick the top caregiver guess, and run only that FA condition first. If the data match, you may skip the rest. If not, you still have the full FA to fall back on. Either way, you get to effective treatment faster.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Ask the parent five open-ended questions, jot the suspected function, and run that FA condition first.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Abstract Open‐Ended Functional Assessment Interviews have limited empirical support for their concurrent validity with functional analysis. To address this issue, we conducted a study wherein 176 independent behavior analysts relied on data collected using Open‐Ended Functional Assessment Interviews to identify the function of challenging behavior in four children with autism. Then, we compared the results of their analyses with those of a traditional functional analysis. Our results showed that the conclusions drawn by behavior analysts using the Open‐Ended Functional Assessment Interviews corresponded with the outcomes of functional analyses in 74% of cases. These findings suggest that the Open‐Ended Functional Assessment Interview may inform functional analyses to develop initial hypotheses.
Behavioral Interventions, 2022 · doi:10.1002/bin.1857