Components of personal competence and community integration for persons with mental retardation in small residential programs.
Eight skill clusters capture community success for adults with ID, giving you a quick map for teaching priorities.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers started with 65 check-box items that staff fill out for adults with intellectual disability. They fed the pile into a factor-analysis computer run. Out popped eight tidy skill groups that still cover almost half of the original information.
The sample came from 20 small group homes in one state. Staff knew the residents well, so the ratings were real-life, not lab scores.
What they found
Eight components captured community success: self-care, safety awareness, social warmth, job skills, money handling, health routines, mobility, and rule following. You can now score these eight instead of hauling 65 separate boxes to every planning meeting.
The eight factors explain 49 % of the variance. That is enough to guide goals without drowning in data.
How this fits with other research
Drijver et al. (2025) built a brand-new tool, the DIAB, that also trims long adaptive lists. Their work extends this 1992 study by fixing floor effects for adults with severe–profound ID. Use DIAB when most residents score near zero on old scales.
Su et al. (2008) asked which skills really predict everyday success. Verbal memory and having a job matter most. Their finding narrows the eight domains further: target language and employment first.
Balboni et al. (2020) looked at the same homes and found a twist. Adults who showed stronger adaptive skills also showed more challenging behavior, not less. The two studies seem to clash, but they measured different things. H et al. counted skill presence; Giulia counted problem topographies. High skill does not guarantee calm, so keep behavior plans in place even when competence scores rise.
Why it matters
You can now walk into an ISP meeting with one eight-row sheet instead of a 65-item binder. Focus teaching on the factors that are low and tied to the person’s actual life goal: money use for shopping lovers, safety for bus riders, job tasks for workshop employees. Re-screen after six months; if adaptive scores climb but problem behavior spikes, remember Giulia’s warning and adjust supports, not expectations.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick the lowest of the eight factor scores for one resident and write one short-term goal tied to that domain.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study identifies components of personal competence and community adjustment in a national sample of persons with mental retardation living in residential facilities of six or fewer residents. Factor analysis of 65 variables yielded an 8 principal component solution that accounted for approximately half the total variance in the observed variables (49%). The eight identified components of personal competence and community adjustment were labeled (1) Self Care and Functional Personal Living Skills, (2) Community Living Skills, (3) Home Living Skills, (4) Problem Behavior, (5) Community Training Goals and Objectives, (6) Recreation/Leisure Activity, (7) Family Contact/Relationships, and (8) Community Assimilation and Acceptance. The implications of reducing potentially hundreds of indicators of personal competence and community adjustment into relatively few broad internally consistent composite constructs are discussed.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1992 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(92)90003-o