Assessment & Research

Comparison of data-collection methods in a behavioral intervention program for children with pervasive developmental disorders: a replication.

Najdowski et al. (2009) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2009
★ The Verdict

Recording only the first trial each day still finds mastery and keeps skills solid.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running DTT or table lessons who want faster data.
✗ Skip if Clinics already using apps that auto-capture every response.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team copied an earlier study to see if two ways of scoring lessons give the same answers.

They taught kids with autism new skills and wrote down results two ways.

One way logged only the first try each day. The other logged every try.

02

What they found

Both ways spotted mastery on the same day.

Skills stayed strong no matter which way the staff counted.

First-trial notes were enough.

03

How this fits with other research

Fuller et al. (2018) pushed further. They asked, "How high should the mastery bar be?" Ninety percent beat lower cut-offs for keeping skills.

Bulla et al. (2026) also copied past work. They showed that fewer, timed trials can teach faster than free-flow drills.

Anonymous (2024) tested a phone app. It gave steady numbers, backing the idea that lean data can still be clean.

04

Why it matters

You can save minutes every session by logging just the first try. Those minutes add up to more teaching time. Try it next week: pick one program, record only trial one, and see if mastery dates stay the same.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Switch one skill to first-trial recording and compare the mastery date to last week.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
null

03Original abstract

Cummings and Carr (2009) compared two methods of data collection in a behavioral intervention program for children with pervasive developmental disorders: collecting data on all trials versus only the first trial in a session. Results showed that basing a child's progress on first-trial data resulted in identifying mastery-level responding slightly sooner, whereas determining mastery based on all trials resulted in slightly better skill maintenance. In the current replication, no such differences in indication of mastery or maintenance were observed when data were collected on all trials or the first trial.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2009 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-827