Assessment & Research

Brief Report: Characteristics of preschool children with ASD vary by ascertainment.

Sacrey et al. (2017) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2017
★ The Verdict

Research studies find milder, more female ASD cases than clinics do.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who use research to guide screening and early diagnosis.
✗ Skip if BCBAs only working with school-age kids or severe cases.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers compared the preschoolers with ASD. Half came from infant-sibling studies. Half came from clinic referrals.

They checked autism severity, IQ, language, and gender mix.

02

What they found

Research-found kids had milder symptoms. They scored higher on IQ and language tests.

More girls showed up in the research group. Clinics saw mostly boys with more severe autism.

03

How this fits with other research

Laposa et al. (2017) found no gender gaps in the kids entering early intervention. This seems to clash with Root et al. (2017). The difference is where kids came from. Research studies attract milder cases and more girls. Clinics see whoever walks in the door.

Chuthapisith et al. (2007) first showed that infant-sibling studies pick different kids. This 2017 paper proves the same point for kids who actually have ASD.

Amaral et al. (2017) compared Down syndrome kids who screen positive for ASD versus diagnosed kids. They also found milder symptoms in the screen-positive group. Different ways of finding kids keep giving the same pattern.

Fombonne et al. (2022) looked at Black and White kids in clinics. They found similar autism symptoms despite different backgrounds. This matches the clinic side of R et al.'s findings.

04

Why it matters

Don't assume research studies match your caseload. If you read that early signs are subtle, remember those studies often track milder cases. Screen all kids the same way, regardless of gender. When reviewing research, always check how they found their participants.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Check if the research you cite used clinic referrals or infant-sibling studies before applying findings to your clients.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
172
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Prospective studies of infant siblings of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) provide a unique opportunity to characterize ASD as it unfolds. A critical question that remains unanswered is whether and how these children with ASD resemble other children identified from the community, including those with no family history. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics of children with ASD identified by each method (n = 86 per group), drawn from two Canadian longitudinal research cohorts. Children ascertained from a prospective cohort were less severely affected and included a larger proportion of girls, compared to the clinically referred sample. These results may have important implications for conclusions drawn from studies of high-risk and clinically referred cohorts.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2017 · doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3062-z