Bone mineral density in adults with Down syndrome, intellectual disability, and nondisabled adults.
Adults with Down syndrome have much lower bone density than peers—screen early and add weight-bearing exercise.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Ellingsen et al. (2014) compared bone density in three adult groups. One group had Down syndrome. One had other intellectual disabilities. One group had no disability.
They used a quasi-experimental design. They scanned hip and spine with a DEXA machine.
What they found
Adults with Down syndrome had the lowest bone density. Their scores were worse than both other groups.
The gap was large enough to raise osteoporosis risk.
How this fits with other research
Dudley et al. (2019) extends this work. They tracked the same adults over time. Men with Down syndrome lost bone fastest in their 30s and 40s.
Waldron et al. (2023) replicated the finding in Brazil. They saw the same low bone mass even when weight, grip strength, and activity looked fine.
Reza et al. (2013) offers hope. In children with Down syndrome, weight-bearing exercise three times a week raised bone density more than calcium pills.
Why it matters
You can add a DEXA referral to the annual plan for any adult with Down syndrome. Start at 35 for men. Also build weight-bearing goals into the program, like stair climbing or light jumps, even if the person seems active.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add five minutes of stair climbing or jumping jacks to the daily schedule
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) or Down syndrome (DS) may be at greater risk of osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) of DS, ID, and non-intellectually disabled (NID) populations. In each group, 33 participants between the ages of 28 and 60 years were compared. BMD was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. BMD (p < .0001) between all groups was significantly different. Participants with DS had significantly lower BMD compared to NID participants. Individuals with ID had significantly lower BMD compared to NID subjects. Participants with DS had the lowest BMD of all groups. DS subjects display a greater risk for osteoporosis than ID subjects or control populations.
American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-119.2.107