Assessment & Research

Behavioral features of Williams Beuren syndrome compared to Fragile X syndrome and subjects with intellectual disability without defined etiology.

Pérez-García et al. (2011) · Research in developmental disabilities 2011
★ The Verdict

Williams-Beuren syndrome brings more anxiety, depression, and attention trouble than Fragile X or non-specific ID, so treat worry first.

✓ Read this if BCBAs assessing or treating children with Williams-Beuren, Fragile X, or mixed-etiology ID.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who work only with autism or typical development.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team compared three groups of children: Williams-Beuren syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, and kids with intellectual disability of unknown cause.

Parents filled out the Child Behavior Checklist to rate anxiety, depression, attention, and other behaviors.

The goal was to see if Williams-Beuren syndrome shows a unique behavior pattern.

02

What they found

The Williams-Beuren group scored highest on anxiety, depression, and attention problems.

Each genetic syndrome had its own set of standout behaviors, not just general delay.

03

How this fits with other research

Wynne et al. (1988) first mapped Fragile X behavior, noting universal hyperactivity and high anxiety. The 2011 study uses that map to show Williams-Beuren is even more anxious.

Harrop et al. (2021) later added Down syndrome to the mix, ranking Fragile X plus autism as the most inflexible group. Together the papers build a ladder: Williams-Beuren tops the anxiety rung, while Fragile X plus autism tops the rigidity rung.

Król et al. (2019) zoomed in on Williams-Beuren and found intolerance of uncertainty links sensory issues to repetitive behavior. This extends the 2011 finding by showing one way anxiety leaks into everyday actions.

04

Why it matters

If you have a client with Williams-Beuren syndrome, expect mood and attention issues that outrun what you see in other genetic disabilities. Screen for anxiety first, then target uncertainty tolerance and flexible routines. These steps can cut problem behaviors before they grow.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add an anxiety rating scale to your intake for any Williams-Beuren client and schedule coping-skill lessons before tackling academic or social targets.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
76
Population
intellectual disability, other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is a genetically determined neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a heterozygous deletion of 26-28 genes on chromosome band 7q11.23. During the past few years, researchers and clinicians have significantly contributed to define the phenotype of the syndrome, including its cognitive and behavioral aspects. However, it is not well known yet whether the psychological problems are specific to the syndrome or secondary to the intellectual disability (ID). The aim of our study was to better define the psychopathological profile of WBS and whether or not it is related with IQ or anxiety symptoms. Twenty-five subjects (12 girls, 13 boys) with a diagnosis of WBS were compared to 27 boys with Fragile X Syndrome and to 24 boys with ID of non-specific etiology using the Child Behavior Checklist. Anxiety, depression and attention problems were the main behavioral problems found in WBS with no gender differences. Significant differences between cohorts were observed in somatic complaints, delinquent behavior, aggressive behavior, and externalizing problems. Some associations between IQ and anxiety items were found. The findings are discussed in terms of behavioral phenotypes, genetic implications and ID.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2011 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.005