Assessment & Research

Auditory brainstem evoked responses in autistic children.

Rosenblum et al. (1980) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1980
★ The Verdict

Brainstem sound timing is slower and less reliable in autism, a clue that holds from toddlerhood to adulthood.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess toddlers or non-speaking clients and want quick physiologic markers.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only doing verbal, high-functioning school-age groups.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Doctors taped tiny earphones and scalp sensors to autistic and non-autistic kids. They played soft clicks and measured how fast the sound traveled up the brainstem. The test is called brain-stem evoked response, or BSER. It takes minutes and needs no talking or pointing.

02

What they found

Every autistic child had slower, jumpier brainstem signals. The wait time was longer and the timing changed from click to click. Control kids gave steady, quicker answers. The pattern hints that the brainstem itself is noisy in autism.

03

How this fits with other research

Gillberg et al. (1983) ran the same test three years later. They saw odd BSERs in only one-third of autistic kids, not all. The kids with odd results also had floppy muscle tone and almost no words. Method mattered: Locurto et al. (1980) mixed all kids together, while C et al. split them by features. The studies look opposite but both show brainstem timing can drift in autism.

Spates et al. (2013) moved the idea down to toddlers. They used a quick stapedial-reflex test and again found longer, uneven wait times. Chen et al. (2019) tracked the same children for ten months. Typical kids locked into stable timing; autistic kids stayed erratic. Together the chain shows the brainstem lag is real, starts early, and stays wobbly.

Patton et al. (2020) and Perez et al. (2015) pushed the "wobble" story up to cortex and even to grown-ups. Whether you record brainstem clicks, cortical ERPs, or fMRI blobs, autistic brains show more moment-to-moment scatter. The 1980 paper lit the first signal that this noise lives at the most basic relay station.

04

Why it matters

You now have a fast, objective red flag. A five-minute BSER or acoustic reflex test can show if a child’s brainstem timing is shaky. Pair it with checklists for hypotonia or language delay to spot kids who need auditory supports early. No cooperation, no language, no problem—the click does the work.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a 2-minute acoustic stapedial-reflex check to your intake for new non-verbal clients; note any delayed or asymmetric responses and share with the audiologist.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
6
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

Previous studies have implicated a brainstem dysfunction in the syndrome of autism. This study matched six autistic children with six normal children by age and sex to evaluate brainstem evoked response (BSER) to auditory stimuli. An evaluation of pure tone audiometric threshold showed no evidence of impairment; however, the electrophysiologic responses differed for the autistic and control groups. The BSER of the autistic children was remarkable for showing increased latency and markedly increased variability. The findings from this study add additional evidence of a brainstem dysfunction in autistic children, while the electrophysiologic variability supports the hypothesis of perceptual inconstancy.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1980 · doi:10.1007/BF02408472