Assessment & Research

Attitudes Towards Sexuality and Sexual Orientation in People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

Armas Junco et al. (2025) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2025
★ The Verdict

There’s almost no research on supporting LGTBIQA+ clients with ID—start by auditing your own sex-ed materials for inclusivity.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write sexuality or relationship goals for teens or adults with intellectual disability.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only serve early-childhood or non-verbal clients with no sexuality programming.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Armas Junco et al. (2025) searched every database they could find for studies about attitudes toward sexuality and sexual orientation in people with intellectual disabilities.

They wanted to know how much research exists, what it says, and where the gaps are.

The team looked at papers from any year, any country, and any design.

02

What they found

The review found almost nothing. Only a handful of studies even mention LGTBIQA+ people with ID.

Most sex-ed research for this group still assumes everyone is straight.

The authors say we need to fight stigma and train staff better.

03

How this fits with other research

Older reviews saw the same blank space, but for abuse instead of orientation. Maddox et al. (2015) and Smit et al. (2019) both showed kids and adults with ID face higher sexual-abuse risk, yet hardly any prevention programs exist.

Wacker et al. (2009) counted just four assault-prevention programs for women with ID. Together these papers paint one picture: we study danger, not healthy identity.

Morris et al. (2021) looked inside behavior-analysis journals and also came up nearly empty. They found only 12 articles that even mention LGBTQ+ people, most from the old conversion-therapy days. Laura’s team widened the lens to every field and still found next to nothing—an apparent contradiction that actually confirms the gap is real across disciplines.

04

Why it matters

If you write sex-ed goals, check them now. Do they assume heterosexuality? Do they use gendered language like “boyfriend/girlfriend” without asking what the learner wants? Swap in neutral terms and ask open questions like “Who do you like?” Small edits signal safety and can open disclosure. Start there while the field catches up.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Replace one binary prompt in your lesson plan (e.g., “Find a boyfriend”) with a neutral choice (e.g., “Pick someone you like”) and note any new client responses.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
systematic review
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Over time, sexuality has become a crucial aspect in people's lives, regardless of physical, intellectual or social conditions, ranging from sex and sexually transmitted diseases to gender identity and sexual orientation. The aim of this study was to carry out a review of the scientific literature on sexual orientation in people with intellectual disabilities from the Education and Health Sciences and to analyse how sex education is addressed in this group. To this end, a systematic review of research on sexual orientation in people with intellectual disabilities was carried out. The results obtained reveal that there is hardly any scientific corpus on this subject, so emphasis should be placed on the attitudes towards LGTBIQA+ people with intellectual disabilities, as well as on the training and understanding of the different sexual orientations they may have. It is essential to face the obstacles, stigmas and prejudices established in society to normalise the sexual needs of these people, improving, consequently, their quality of life.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2025 · doi:10.1111/jir.13219