Assessment of seizures and related symptomatology in persons with mental retardation.
Use direct observation plus caregiver input to catch seizures and drug side-effects that medical records alone miss.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Burack et al. (2004) wrote a narrative review about spotting seizures in people with intellectual disability.
They pulled together tips from medical and behavior literature. The goal was to give clinicians a clear map for assessment.
What they found
The paper does not give new numbers. It lists tools you can use today.
Key advice: watch the person, talk to caregivers, and check drug side-effects. Good records help tell a seizure from a behavior spike.
How this fits with other research
Pilgrim et al. (2000) looked at the same group four years earlier. They warned that most studies only talk about drugs, not service quality. Burack et al. (2004) echo that gap and push for fuller assessment.
Arcieri et al. (2015) went further. They used long video-EEG in children with severe disability. Nearly 4 in 10 events thought to be seizures were not. Their data show why A et al.’s call for careful observation still matters.
Baker et al. (2005) gave us the SEIZES B scale. It gives reliable numbers on anticonvulsant side effects. This tool turns the 2004 idea of “check side-effects” into a quick rating form you can hand to nurses.
Why it matters
If you work with adults or children who have ID and epilepsy, this review is your reminder to look beyond the chart. Pair medical files with direct observation and caregiver interview. Add the SEIZES B scale for side-effects. This trio can stop misdiagnosis and cut unneeded drugs, saving you time and keeping clients safe.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one client with epilepsy, watch for 10 minutes, and ask the caregiver one question about recent odd spells; write both notes in the file.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Seizures can be debilitating across a number of physical, social, occupational, and personal variables. Given the deficits in all of these areas frequently present in persons with mental retardation, effective assessment and subsequent treatment of seizures is a primary goal for individuals with both mental retardation and epilepsy. To thoroughly address the behavioral domains related to seizures in persons with mental retardation and epilepsy, areas of assessment should include seizure behavior, triggering stimuli, reinforcing consequences, and antiepileptic medication side effects. Assessment of these areas in this population often deviates from methods typically used with persons of normal intelligence. Specifically, direct behavioral observation and third-party report with structured interviews are the most viable and accessible means of assessment, and efforts to establish reliable and valid protocols have been successful in some areas. This article reviews this assessment methodology and discusses the extant issues in establishing and proliferating such approaches.
Behavior modification, 2004 · doi:10.1177/0145445503259839