Assessment & Research

Assessing recollection and familiarity in low functioning autism.

Ni Chuileann et al. (2013) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2013
★ The Verdict

Word-free memory tasks for non-verbal autism are here—use them to check if recall versus familiarity looks different from higher-functioning cases.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess or teach non-verbal clients with autism.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only working with fully verbal, high-functioning clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Ni Chuileann et al. (2013) tried out new memory games for kids with low-functioning autism.

The games separate "remember" from "just feels familiar" without needing words.

No scores are given yet; the team only describes the pilot setup.

02

What they found

The paper only tells us the tasks exist.

We still need the full article to see if these kids show the same memory split seen in higher-functioning autism.

03

How this fits with other research

Bigham et al. (2010) built the first word-free tasks for higher-functioning clients. Susan’s group took the same idea and made it work for kids who speak little or not at all.

Gras-Vincendon et al. (2007) found normal temporal memory in higher-functioning autism. That looks like a clash, but their clients had strong language. Susan’s pilot targets the opposite end of the spectrum, so both can be true.

Giesbers et al. (2020) later showed that school-age kids with ASD make more false memories. Susan’s non-verbal tasks could one day show if the same slip happens when language is removed.

04

Why it matters

You now have a ready-made tool kit that probes memory without asking questions. Try the shape and action games with non-verbal clients to see which errors they make. Track if errors drop when you add visual cues or reduce task length. The data you collect will help decide if recollection and familiarity split the same way across all autism levels.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run one shape-recognition trial with a non-verbal client and note if they point to new items or old ones—this gives you a quick familiarity score without any language.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
case series
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Methods to assess recollection and familiarity separately in autism spectrum disorder were recently developed and piloted (Bigham et al. in J Autism Dev Disord 40:878-889, 2010). The preliminary data obtained via these methods showed that whereas recollection was mildly impaired in high functioning autism, familiarity was spared. The current study set out to replicate the methods of assessment for recollection and familiarity devised by Bigham and her colleagues with individuals diagnosed with low functioning autism (LFA). Three critical modifications to the original paradigms were made within the current study. The modifications and implications of the findings for individuals with LFA will be discussed.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2013 · doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1697-3