Antenatal ultrasound and risk of autism spectrum disorders.
Routine prenatal ultrasounds do not increase autism risk, so BCBAs can ease parent guilt around standard imaging.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers compared ultrasound records for kids later diagnosed with autism and kids without autism.
They counted every scan across all three trimesters.
The groups were matched so other birth factors would not cloud the picture.
What they found
Kids with autism had the same number of pre-birth scans as kids without autism.
No trimester showed a bump or drop in scan counts.
The result was flat: ultrasound exposure did not raise autism odds.
How this fits with other research
Chien et al. (2015) saw a small jump in autism risk when moms had general anesthesia for C-section.
That sounds opposite, but the exposures differ: routine imaging versus major surgery drugs.
Nicholson et al. (2017) also found nothing when they checked newborn thyroid blood spots, another null that keeps ultrasound company.
He et al. (2024) pooled many studies and agreed: labor and childhood anesthesia look safe, backing the larger pattern that common prenatal events rarely cause autism.
Why it matters
You can tell worried parents that normal pregnancy ultrasounds have no proven link to autism.
Save your clinical energy for factors with solid evidence, like maternal diabetes or PCOS flagged by Bravo-Muñoz et al. (2025).
Keep watching for new data, but for now ultrasound fears can go on the shelf.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →If a parent mentions ultrasound worry, share that large comparisons show no extra scans in kids with autism.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We evaluated antenatal ultrasound (U/S) exposure as a risk factor for autism spectrum disorders (ASD), comparing affected singleton children and control children born 1995-1999 and enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente health care system. Among children with ASD (n = 362) and controls (n = 393), 13% had no antenatal exposure to U/S examinations; case-control differences in number of exposures during the entire gestation or by trimester were small and not statistically significant. In analyses adjusted for covariates, cases were generally similar to controls with regard to the number of U/S scans throughout gestation and during each trimester. This study indicates that antenatal U/S is unlikely to increase the risk of ASD, although studies examining ASD subgroups remain to be conducted.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2010 · doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0859-4