An examination of social interaction profiles based on the factors measured by the screen for social interaction.
The SSI gives four clear social-interaction factors that separate autism from other groups and point you to the first skill to teach.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team looked at the Screen for Social Interaction (SSI). This is a parent checklist about how a child acts with others.
They ran a factor analysis. This math tool groups questions that move together. It shows what the test really measures.
What they found
Four clear factors popped out. One covers play skills, another covers social interest, and so on.
Kids with autism scored differently from typical kids and from kids with other mental-health needs. The four-factor profile helps tell the groups apart.
How this fits with other research
Tillmann et al. (2019) took the idea further. They showed that social-communication scores, not sensory or repetitive items, predict daily-life skills across the lifespan. Danitz et al. (2014) gave us the clean factors; Julian linked the social factor to real-world outcomes.
Fong et al. (2020) add another layer. They found that self-monitoring, an executive-function skill, predicts social gaps in autism. Together the papers say: use the SSI to spot social-interaction factors, then teach self-monitoring to close the gaps.
Moss et al. (2009) sounds gloomy—none of five toddler screeners worked well. The SSI study does not fight that claim; it simply gives a sharper tool for later screening after toddler age.
Why it matters
You now have a four-factor map inside the SSI. When a parent hands in the form, look at which factor is lowest. If play skills tank, start with peer-play scripts. If social interest is flat, use reinforcement for approaching others. The map tells you where to aim first.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Print the SSI factor key, score this week’s intakes, and pick the lowest factor as your first teaching target.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Deficits in the capacity to engage in social interactions are a core deficit associated with Autistic Disorder (AD) and Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS). These deficits emerge at a young age, making screening for social interaction deficits and interventions targeted at improving capacity in this area important for early identification and intervention. Screening and early intervention efforts are particularly important given the poor short and long term outcomes for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) who experience social interaction deficits. The Screen for Social Interaction (SSI) is a well-validated screening measure that examines a child's capacity for social interaction using a developmental approach. The present study identified four underlying factors measured by the SSI, namely, Connection with Caregiver, Interaction/Imagination, Social Approach/Interest, and Agreeable Nature. The resulting factors were utilized to compare social interaction profiles across groups of children with AD, PDD-NOS, children with non-ASD developmental and/or psychiatric conditions and typically developing children. The results indicate that children with AD and those with PDD-NOS had similar social interaction profiles, but were able to be distinguished from typically developing children on every factor and were able to be distinguished from children with non-ASD psychiatric conditions on every factor except the Connection with Caregiver factor. In addition, children with non-ASD developmental and/or psychiatric conditions could be distinguished from typically developing children on the Connection with Caregiver factor and the Social Approach/Interest factor. These findings have implications for screening and intervention for children with ASDs and non-ASD psychiatric conditions.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.008