Assessment & Research

A strategy for screening memory functions in individuals with mental retardation.

McDaniel et al. (1998) · Research in developmental disabilities 1998
★ The Verdict

A four-test memory screen reliably sorts memory skills by ID severity and stays stable on repeat testing.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess memory skills in teens or adults with intellectual disability
✗ Skip if Practitioners looking only for dementia-specific tools or mental-health screens

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The authors built a quick four-part memory screen for people with intellectual disability. It checks verbal, visual, immediate, and delayed memory in one short battery.

They gave the battery to participants with different severity levels to see if scores lined up with known IQ ranges. They also re-tested the same people later to check if results stayed stable.

02

What they found

Scores on the four tests cleanly separated mild, moderate, and severe intellectual disability groups. When the same people took the battery again, their scores hardly moved, showing good test-retest reliability.

03

How this fits with other research

Pyo et al. (2010) and Neuringer et al. (2007) took the next step. They kept the short-battery idea but swapped in visual-only tasks to spot early dementia in adults with Down syndrome and other IDs.

Wilkinson et al. (1998) looked at the same question in the same year but tried the Short IQCODE instead. That tool showed weak reliability, so the four-domain battery remained the stronger choice for memory screening.

Together the papers form a timeline: start with the broad four-test screen, then refine it for specific risks like dementia or Down syndrome.

04

Why it matters

If you need a quick map of memory strengths and weaknesses for an adult or child with ID, this battery gives you four scores in one go. Use it during intake to decide which areas need deeper testing or to track small changes over time. Later studies show you can swap in targeted visual tasks if dementia is a concern, but this 1998 set still provides the solid foundation.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run the four subtests at intake, note the lowest domain, and plan skill-building or further assessment there first.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
methodology paper
Sample size
125
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

In an attempt to develop a protocol for evaluating mentally retarded clients from a neurobehavioral perspective, a strategy for screening complex verbal, simple verbal, simple visual, and spatial working memory was developed. This strategy results in numeric values on each of the aspects of memory, and it can contribute to a "global index" of memory function. The strategy is described so that it might be adopted by other practitioners interested in screening their client's ability to store and retrieve newly acquired information. Descriptive data for 125 persons carrying diagnoses of mild, moderate, and severe mental retardation are presented. The procedure was found to discriminate well between the various levels of mental retardation, correlate reasonably well with IQ, and possess relatively good test-retest reliability.

Research in developmental disabilities, 1998 · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00011-0