A replication of the response‐restriction preference assessment
MSWO and response-restriction give complete preference hierarchies more often than free-operant, but staff still disagree on which feels best.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Boyle et al. (2019) ran the response-restriction preference assessment again to see if it still works.
They tested kids with autism and compared three formats: free-operant, MSWO, and response-restriction.
The goal was to see which format gives a full ranking of liked items every time.
What they found
Only MSWO and response-restriction gave complete hierarchies in 4 out of 18 tries.
Free-operant rarely gave a full list.
Staff and parents also rated the formats differently, so no one format won the popularity vote.
How this fits with other research
Embregts (2000) showed reinforcer surveys are only 57 % accurate, so asking alone is risky.
Sipila-Thomas et al. (2024) later proved email feedback helps teachers run MSWO correctly, making MSWO easier to use in schools.
Together the three studies say: skip surveys, pick MSWO or response-restriction, and give teachers quick feedback to keep fidelity high.
Why it matters
You now know free-operant is weak at ranking items, so drop it when you need a clear hierarchy.
Choose MSWO or response-restriction, then train staff with brief feedback like Sipila-Thomas did.
This combo saves session time and gives you reliable reinforcer lists for teaching new skills.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run one MSWO this week, email the results to the aide, and ask her to repeat it while you watch for five minutes.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
AbstractWe replicated the response‐restriction (RR) preference assessment and compared results in terms of preference hierarchies to those from free‐operant and multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO) formats with six children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). We also assessed social validity of each format with teachers and clinicians who work with children with ASDs. Complete hierarchies were produced in four of 18 assessments and with MSWO and RR formats only. Results of the social validity assessment varied across raters, with each preference assessment format receiving the highest rating from at least one rater. Results are discussed in terms of practical recommendations and relative to the preference assessment literature as a whole.
Behavioral Interventions, 2019 · doi:10.1002/bin.1683