Assessment & Research

A critical analysis of approaches to targeted PTSD prevention: current status and theoretically derived future directions.

Feldner et al. (2007) · Behavior modification 2007
★ The Verdict

PTSD prevention still lacks theory-driven trials, so pick interventions like CBT or EMDR that already link to known maintenance loops.

✓ Read this if BCBAs designing or supervising PTSD services in clinics or hospitals.
✗ Skip if RBTs who only run skill-acquisition programs with no trauma component.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Koskentausta et al. (2007) read every PTSD prevention paper they could find. They looked for the ideas that keep PTSD stuck. They wrote a map of those ideas so future studies can aim better.

The paper is a narrative review, not new data. It tells researchers where the holes are.

02

What they found

The team found no solid, theory-driven PTSD prevention trials. Most studies skip the known maintenance loops like avoidance or trauma cues.

They list clear targets: cut avoidance, teach coping, and test early before PTSD locks in.

03

How this fits with other research

Flint et al. (2020) pooled seven small trials of behavioral activation for PTSD. The average drop was 26 %, but the pooled effect was not significant. Koskentausta et al. (2007) warned that weak theory leads to weak results; Flint’s nonsignificant meta supports that warning.

Torchalla et al. (2018) showed CBT and EMDR give 58–80 % return-to-work rates for work-related PTSD. These programs use the same theory Koskentausta et al. (2007) asked for. The high RTW numbers show theory-driven work can win.

Storm (1990) said child-abuse trauma studies lacked rigor. Koskentausta et al. (2007) echoes the same plea for better methods, just in a new population. The two papers form a 17-year call for tighter science.

04

Why it matters

If you run or design PTSD services, use the maintenance loops Koskentausta et al. (2007) list as your treatment targets. Pick CBT or EMDR with proven theory, not untested packages. Track return-to-work or daily coping, not just symptom scores.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one avoidance-busting exposure task to each PTSD client’s plan and track it daily.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
anxiety disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Although efforts to prevent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have met with relatively limited success, theoretically driven preventive approaches with promising efficacy are emerging. The current article critically reviews investigations of PTSD prevention programs that target persons at risk for being exposed to a traumatic event or who have been exposed to a traumatic event. This review uniquely extends prior reviews in this area by using theories of PTSD to suggest future directions in the area of PTSD prevention. The authors first discuss the primary mechanisms of action believed to account for the failure for PTSD symptoms to remit among a substantial minority of traumatic event-exposed individuals. Second, empirical progress in PTSD prevention efforts is reviewed. Third, the authors consider how existing prevention programs target these mechanisms of action. Finally, the authors consider directions for future research in the area of targeted PTSD prevention.

Behavior modification, 2007 · doi:10.1177/0145445506295057