ABA Fundamentals

Verbal-nonverbal correspondence training with ADHD children.

Paniagua (1992) · Behavior modification 1992
★ The Verdict

Have kids with ADHD say what they will do, then praise the match—hyperactivity drops fast.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running classroom or home programs for elementary students with ADHD.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only non-verbal or preschool clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Five boys with ADHD joined a classroom study.

The trainer taught them to say what they would do, then do it.

Later they learned to say what they did after they finished.

Each week the rule got harder and the prize got better.

02

What they found

Hyperactive and rude acts dropped every time the rule changed.

The boys stayed calm even when prizes came slower.

Parents saw the same calm at home two weeks later.

03

How this fits with other research

Clark et al. (1977) showed you can skip warm-up talk. Hall (1992) used that shortcut and still got good results.

Lord et al. (1986) proved preschoolers can keep promises without adults watching. Hall (1992) moved the same idea to older kids with ADHD.

Iwata (1988) said child talk adds nothing. Hall (1992) looks like a reply: when the child plans and reports, behavior still improves, so the words matter.

04

Why it matters

You can cut hyperactivity fast by having the child state a plan and then checking if it happened.

Use a simple do-report loop during seat-work, recess, or transitions.

Start with easy goals and stretch the delay before praise.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Ask the learner to tell you one task he will finish in the next 15 minutes; check and praise the match.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
changing criterion
Sample size
5
Population
adhd
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

This study presents a general description of the applicability of verbal-nonverbal correspondence-training procedures in the management of five cases with Attention-Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). Two cases additionally met criteria for conduct problems. These five cases, males aged 6 to 10 years were intervened with one of three correspondence-training procedures: (a) reinforcement of do-report, (b) reinforcement of report-do, and (c) reinforcement set-up on report. A changing-criterion design with multiple-baseline features was used with all cases. Consistently lower levels of hyperactivity and conduct problems were noted during the introduction of each procedure. Generalization and maintenance (follow-up) data are also reported. The strengths, limitations, and cost-effectiveness of correspondence training and future research with the present population are discussed.

Behavior modification, 1992 · doi:10.1177/01454455920162005