ABA Fundamentals

Using intermittent reinforcement to program maintenance of verbal/nonverbal correspondence.

Baer et al. (1987) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1987
★ The Verdict

After kids learn to say and do the right thing, switching to occasional rewards keeps the behavior strong.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running correspondence training in preschool or clinic rooms.
✗ Skip if Clinicians whose clients still need a reward every response.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with preschoolers during snack time. First they taught the kids to say "I will pick the healthy snack" and then do it.

After each child matched words and actions, the teachers switched from giving a sticker every time to giving one only sometimes. They watched to see if good choices lasted when rewards were rare.

02

What they found

Even with stickers now and then, every child kept picking fruit or milk. When the teachers stopped all rewards, the healthy choices still stuck.

Intermittent reinforcement made the new habit strong without needing a prize every time.

03

How this fits with other research

Al-Jawahiri et al. (2019) looked at 28 later studies and found the same pattern: thinning rewards keeps gains if the child can talk about the task.

Alsop et al. (1995) seems to disagree. Their adults followed instructions worse when verbal praise came only sometimes. The gap closes when you see the 1995 study tested brand-new instructions, while Matthews et al. (1987) waited until the rule was already a habit.

Herman et al. (1971) showed the same trick works for printing: intermittent praise plus quick play kept every kindergartner writing neatly.

04

Why it matters

You can fade edible or sticker rewards fast once a child can state the rule and do it. Move to praise or tokens only twice per session while the skill stays solid. This saves you time and cuts satiation while keeping the behavior in place.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After three correct say-do matches, thin to fixed-ratio-2 praise for one week.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
3
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

We investigated the effects of an intermittent reinforcement procedure on maintenance of verbal/nonverbal correspondence with nutritious snack choices in a day-care setting. Nutritious snack choices were first established using correspondence training procedures in a multiple baseline across three children. Withdrawal of the procedures with one subject led to loss of appropriate responding, suggesting the need for a maintenance strategy. The intermittent reinforcement procedure was implemented in a multiple baseline across subjects. Nutritious snack choices were observed consistently during the intermittent reinforcement condition and the subsequent extinction condition.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1987 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1987.20-179