ABA Fundamentals

Ubiquity of schedule-induced polydipsia.

Gilbert (1974) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1974
★ The Verdict

Timing of reinforcers, not the reinforcer itself, can create extra drinking or movement.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing feeding or token programs in clinics or schools.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working on skill acquisition with no timed reinforcement.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Baer (1974) watched hungry rats that got food pellets on a fixed-time schedule. Water was always there.

The team wanted to know if the rats would drink too much just because food came on a clock, not because they were thirsty.

02

What they found

Every rat drank a lot right after each pellet. The timing of food, not the food itself, drove the drinking.

The paper says this 'schedule-induced polydipsia' shows up whenever water is present during spaced feeding.

03

How this fits with other research

Falk (1966) and Smith (1967) already showed longer gaps between pellets make more drinking. Baer (1974) widens the claim: any gap works.

Nelson et al. (1978) later stretched the gap to 60 s and tripled intake, giving numbers to the 'ubiquity' idea.

O'Leary et al. (1979) moved the effect to humans; people paced rooms on the same kind of token schedule, proving the rule crosses species and behaviors.

04

Why it matters

If your client paces, chews, or drinks too much during breaks, check the schedule first. Long waits for tokens or bites can create extra behaviors that look like problem behavior but are just adjunctive. Try shorter intervals or give water only after the task to see the change.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Cut the wait between bites or tokens to 15 s and watch adjunctive behavior drop.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Spaced feeding of individual food pellets to food-deprived rats induced excessive drinking after pellet delivery if water was continuously available. When access to water was restricted to a portion of the inter-pellet interval, and competition from food-reinforced bar pressing was removed, excessive drinking occurred whenever drinking was possible. This finding extends the generality of accounts of excessive behavior that implicate induction by apparently unrelated scheduling characteristics of the environment.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1974 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.21-277