Training self-advocacy skills to adults with mild handicaps.
BST can teach adults with mild handicaps to recognize and fix legal-rights violations, and later studies show a quick in-vivo booster helps when real-life performance lags.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Sievert et al. (1988) worked with eight young adults who had mild handicaps.
The team used Behavioral Skills Training to teach a self-advocacy program.
They measured how well the adults could spot and fix legal-rights violations.
What they found
After training, all eight adults showed big gains in standing up for their rights.
They learned to notice when rules were broken and to speak up the right way.
The skills held steady across different situations.
How this fits with other research
Peterson et al. (2021) and Stannis et al. (2019) took the same BST recipe into real-life danger spots.
Peterson taught adults with IDD a four-step script for coworker victimization.
Stannis added short in-situ practice when BST alone was not enough for an anti-bullying script.
Together these studies show BST works for self-advocacy, and a quick in-vivo booster can finish the job when generalization lags.
Berube et al. (2021) used the same design with preschoolers learning stranger-danger skills, proving BST spans ages and risks.
Why it matters
If you serve adults with mild ID, you now have a clear playbook.
Run the classic BST steps to teach clients how to spot rights violations and assertively redress them.
If performance stalls in the real world, add brief in-situ rehearsal like Stannis did.
You can lift the exact script format from Peterson or Stannis and swap in legal-rights content.
This keeps your clients safer at work, in housing, and in the community.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Teach one self-advocacy script this week: model the steps, rehearse with the client, give feedback, then test it in a real setting and add brief in-situ practice if needed.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We developed and empirically evaluated an instructional program to teach self-advocacy skills to eight young adults with mild handicaps. Participants were taught to discriminate whether or not possible violations of legal rights occurred in socially validated scenarios and, if so, to role-play how to redress rights violations. Experimental control was demonstrated with a multiple probe design across four general legal rights categories for the discrimination component of training, and a multiple probe across groups of subjects for the redressing legal rights component of training. Participants' behavior was probed in simulations and deceptions of legal rights violations in natural settings. There were marked increases in dependent measures after instruction. Difficulties in assessing generalization and maintenance of low-rate behaviors and suggestions for future research are presented.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1988 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-299